Hungarian FM: ‘Fair chance’ that NATO summit can avoid escalation of war
There is a “fair chance” that the NATO summit under way in Vilnius can avoid an escalation of the war in Ukraine, and makes a “responsible decision” on Ukraine’s perspectives of joining the alliance, Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó said on Tuesday.
The most important objective of the summit for Hungary is reinforcing the statement that NATO is not part of the conflict and will do everything in its power to avoid an escalation, a ministry statement cited Szijjártó as saying ahead of the meeting.
“That is of primary interest for those living in the war’s immediate neighbourhood, as an escalation would first endanger the countries that are geographically the nearest,” he said.
“All other issues, including the future relations between Ukraine and NATO, will have to be interpreted in that context,” he added.
Meanwhile, “there is a camp campaigning forcefully for a clear schedule” for Ukraine’s NATO accession, he said. “Those thinking responsibly and advising caution oppose that agenda,” he said.
Szijjártó insisted that Hungary had been alone to propagate caution openly, “while there were others [advising caution] behind closed doors”. Many of those countries have recently promoted caution publicly, too, “and it became clear that the number of those thinking responsibly is larger than it seemed,” he said.
“Obviously, the NATO integration of a country currently at war is out of the question. … That would mean an immediate threat of war to the entire alliance,” he said.
There is a “good chance” for a responsible decision as the draft of the summit’s closing declaration contains no concrete deadline for Ukraine’s NATO integration, he said. It only refers to the Bucharest declaration of 2008 “which says that Ukraine can eventually become a member of NATO”, he said.
NATO is a value-based organisation, and those values will also play a role in the accession procedure, he said.
One such value is the protection of minorities, which NATO has set to Ukraine as an expectation, Szijjártó said. Hungary will monitor that issue especially closely, and will consider it carefully when determining its stance on the issue, he said.
The draft of the closing document also states that Ukraine’s invitation to NATO is conditional on the country fulfilling all requirements, “so there is no commitment,” he said.
“Unless the draft changes significantly in the coming hours, I think there is a chance to avoid the most irresponsible and dangerous decision,” he said.
Regarding the ratification of Sweden’s NATO membership, Szijjártó noted that the government had submitted its proposal to parliament months ago. “We obviously did that because we support the ratification … when parliament concludes the ratification process is a technical issue,” he said.
Source: MTI
please make a donation here
Hot news
Hungarian FM Szijjártó: ‘Pro-war mainstream launches final attack against new reality’
Can Budapest host the Olympics? Insight from a sports expert: ‘Hungary is an underdog with a chance’
EPP leader Manfred Weber protecting Orbán-challenger Péter Magyar?
Want to give your workplace a trendy feel? Here’s what you need to do!
Top Hungary news: alcohol ban, collapsed footballer, snow, most expensive hamburger, emergency landing – 17 November, 2024
Will Roman Catholic priests be obliged to report suspected pedophile crimes in Hungary?
2 Comments
Szijjarto mentions the Bucharest declaration saying Ukraine should eventually become a NATO member. Have you ever heard Szijjarto or Orban mention the memorandum signed in their own country which is the Budapest Memorandum? Do they choose to forget that one? Not a peep out of those two about the Budapest Memorandum It’s the one where Russia committed itself to respect Ukraine’s borders and sovereignty in return for giving up the nuclear weapons it possessed to Russia.. Russia can never be trusted. The only way Ukraine’s security can be assured is by NATO membership when the war is over. In the meantime all means must be provided to Ukraine to push Russia out. The signatories include the US and Britain and there are side agreement from France and China. It stipulates: “Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to the signatory if they “should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used”.. Ukraine is entitled to military assistance according to the terms of the agreement and this was signed by Russia.
Doubt it. The military-industrial complex and other very rich and very powerful people have way too much to lose from deescalation. Plus, to be honest, the idea that Russia’s aggression should be rewarded or its results accepted doesn’t sit well with (a part of) me.