Controversy erupts over €12 Billion Grand Budapest development: critics raise strong objections
Grand Budapest presents an urban development opportunity to the Hungarian capital on an unprecedented scale, but not everyone is pleased. Critics have already begun speaking out against the project and its implications for urban growth.
As reported immediately yesterday, the sale of the Rákosrendező railway station, which has been neglected for decades, has been officially concluded. The real estate development, called Grand Budapest, aims to create a modern, world-class district. Here are the details: Goodbye mini-Dubai, hello Grand Budapest: The €12 billion urban transformation!
Debate over Grand Budapest within the Government
In Budapest, under current legislation, buildings may be up to 90 metres high. However, according to the Ministry of National Economy the Eagle Hills’ Grand Budapest proposal allows for buildings up to 250–500 metres high in some parts of the area. This implies that the Government will support the construction of these taller buildings.
However, another ministry has expressed the opposite view regarding the Grand Budapest project, as Telex was informed:
“The Ministry of Construction and Transport continues to insist on compliance with the relevant provisions of the Hungarian Architecture Act (Act C of 2023), which prohibit the construction of buildings up to 500 metres. We do not support the construction of 500-metre-high buildings or skyscrapers.”
The ministry did not clarify why it considers such skyscrapers harmful in a designated area of the Hungarian capital, particularly given the examples of other global cities. London and Paris, for instance, attract hundreds of thousands of tourists who come to admire their skyscrapers.
The Government has stated that the area’s development will not be neglected. Around €800 million worth of public infrastructure improvements are planned, including the construction of a pedestrian and railway overpass, upgrades to railway tracks, the extension of the M1 metro line, the creation of a cycle and pedestrian path, and the covering of railway tracks to establish a park above them.
- Read also: Liget City Project received the green light in Budapest downtown: new apartments, offices, garages – VISUALS
Budapest Mayor files data request for Grand Budapest project contract
Following the announcement of the land sale, Gergely Karácsony, the Mayor of Budapest, described the move as a “net betrayal of the country”, claiming that the government had sold off one of Budapest’s “gold reserves” to an Arab investor who had previously destroyed a similar area in Belgrade. He remarked: “Instead of unaffordable luxury skyscrapers, we need affordable housing and greening in Rákosrendező.”
On Monday, Karácsony stated that he had filed a public interest data request with the railway company MÁV and the National Asset Manager for the contract related to the redevelopment of the city’s Rákosrendező district.
“We have repeatedly demanded that the government’s dealings with the Arab investors on the mini-Dubai project be made public,” Karácsony wrote in a Facebook post.
“Yet they signed a contract without any competition whatsoever, keeping every detail secret, including the purchase price and the investor’s true intentions.” He explained that his public data request, filed in accordance with freedom of information laws, applies to “all of the contract’s annexes and appendices”. The mayor also warned that the city council would take legal action if the documents were not disclosed within the legally mandated deadline.
Vitézy: 500-metre skyscrapers are out of the question in Budapest
Dávid Vitézy, leader of the Podmaniczky Movement in the city assembly, agreed with the Mayor’s concerns, describing the Grand Budapest proposal as nonsensical for the Hungarian capital.
“Budapest is a uniquely valuable historic city,” he stated. “There are only a handful of places worldwide that can boast a historic city centre as large and as coherently preserved as ours. Its architectural, cultural, tourist, and world heritage values would be threatened by a 500-metre-high building on the edge of the city centre, which rivals János Hill. Such a building would be 3.5 times taller than the MOL Tower. For comparison, the tallest buildings in Warsaw or London, such as the Warsaw Tower or the Shard, are 310 metres high, and even the Empire State Building in New York is not 500 metres tall.”
In his view, Budapest does not require skyscrapers. Neither additional office space nor luxury apartments in such buildings are among the city’s most pressing needs—unlike the shortage of affordable rental housing.