Interview with Sandor Balogh, the co-president of African-Hungarian Union: Africa’s problems need to be resolved in Africa

The African-Hungarian Union (AHU) is an international Non-Governmental Development Organization (NGDO). AHU has organized development projects for marginalized social groups in ten countries of Africa so far: Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Guinea, Kenya, Madagascar, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, and Uganda. The members of the organisation believe that what is happening in Africa in the global context of our days has a direct effect on our lives, thus problems in Africa must be our concern as well, alfahir.hu reported.

AHU has issued a communique concerning the recent immigration problems, in which they express that they follow the drama in the Mediterranean Sea and in the Balkans with great compassion and anxiety. They condemn discrimination based on people’s skin colour, origin, or religion, and emphasize that immigration, especially illegal immigration, does not solve anything in the world. The problems of Africa need to be resolved in Africa with European help, writes AHU in the communique.

The questions of Alfahir are answered by Sandor Balogh, the co-president of AHU.

As you write in your communique, you condemn discrimination, and insist that those Europeans whose predecessors were immigrants should be allowed to live their lives safely on our continent, and we should encourage them to contribute to the prosperity of our nations. Do you think that these people have a good reason to fear in Europe?

Sandor Balogh: The current crisis, as crises in general, has negative impact on everybody concerned. The situation is neither pleasant for those who have decided to step on the bumpy road of immigration, nor for those who experience that the massive wave of immigrants has subverted their everyday lives. As for the crisis itself, it can fuel all kinds of extremist thoughts or conceptions which discriminate people based on their religion, ethnicity, or origin, and it might incite people to violence as well. The culture of violence and exclusion may take various forms from the fanatics of the Islamic state through the Charleston shooting to the extremist Buddhist monks who drove Rohingya people out of their homes. Europe has become particularly vulnerable due to the financial crisis and the massive wave of immigrants, and we strongly reject all forms of this.

What is your opinion about the government’s planned resolution? Do you support it? What do you think about that proposal of the Jobbik which promotes the setting up of a border police?

Sandor Balogh: The African-Hungarian Union is an independent civil organisation, therefore it does not wish to comment on the Hungarian party and internal politics. Consequently, we have not formed and will not form any corporative opinion in similar cases. Nevertheless, we clearly believe that anything happening in the territory or at the direct borders of the European Union could only be rescue operations. The solution should emerge far away from the borders of Europe. The prime objective should be to create such conditions in Africa that would encourage people to stay where they originally belong.

Where do you think illegal immigration may lead to? How many people may take the road towards Europe over the next years according to your estimates?

Sandor Balogh: Our aim is not to scare the public, nor is it to understate the question. We rather wish to demonstrate how complex problem we are facing, therefore we do not make any such estimates, and we do not believe that it is reasonable to quantify the problem. The current crisis was generated by several factors: two stable and reliable nations of the Middle East and North Africa, namely Syria and Libya collapsed, along with the worsening of the security situation in West Africa. Europe became vulnerable and uncertain after the global economic crisis. In addition, such long term risk factors as climate change and migration caused by draught contribute to the above mentioned factors. We can forecast neither political, nor economic, nor environmental processes and changes accurately – we can only tell which changes could increase and which changes could reduce migration pressure. The stabilization of the situation both in Syria and in Libya, and the establishment of strong central governments in these countries could considerably reduce immigration. On the contrary, any further destabilization of a bigger country in the Middle East would exponentially increase the number of asylum seekers. A serious draught or famine in Africa or in the Middle East may force local people to leave their homes. However, achieving good yield throughout many years could prevent agricultural households from leaving their lands. In this rapidly changing international situation, it is almost impossible to provide a more accurate prognosis.