Subscribe to our social channels to get the latest news about Hungary!
DE
Even a government-affiliated expert claims Russian interference is unprecedented during the election campaign
Change language:
A researcher affiliated with Hungary’s government-linked Mathias Corvinus Collegium (MCC) has warned that Russia may be carrying out an unusually sophisticated attempt to influence Hungarian elections.
Russian interference like this is unheard of in the European Union
In a lengthy Facebook post published early on Saturday, Russia expert Zalán Alkonyi argued that the scale and complexity of the alleged interference would be without precedent within the European Union. According to Alkonyi, the potential operation involves multiple layers of activity, ranging from diplomatic pressure to cyber operations and coordinated information campaigns.
A wide range of possible tactics
The researcher outlined several forms of influence that could be part of the effort. These include diplomatic signals from Moscow, intelligence-related messaging, cyberattacks and the spread of pro-Russian narratives across media and social platforms.
One example he highlighted was the alleged use of paid influencers, reports 24.hu. Alkonyi referred to the network associated with commentator Lauren Chen, which reportedly received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Russian government to amplify pro-Russian messaging online. Chen previously visited Hungary and appeared at a festival.
Other elements mentioned in the analysis include suspected automated bot networks, artificial-intelligence-assisted communication campaigns and the direct online activity of the Russian embassy in debates with Hungarian opposition figures. The researcher also pointed to incidents such as cyberattacks, the publication of personal data belonging to opposition activists and earlier attacks targeting the Hungarian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
Russia.
What about the unbelievable propaganda as well as funding being churned out by Brussels and its little patsies (“nonprofits,” “N.G.Os.,” etc.) in favor of Magyar? No-one’s even mentioning that because it is so common and expected that it doesn’t even raise an eyebrow anymore.
The opposition isn’t just fighting a popular incumbent; they are fighting the Hungarian state apparatus itself. Fidesz has created a system where the opposition can win votes, but Fidesz wins the math.
While the debate over foreign NGO money is valid, the domestic reality is that Viktor Orbán and Fidesz have spent the last 16 years engineering the political playing field to ensure that “losing” is mathematically and structurally difficult for them.
It is not necessarily about stuffing ballot boxes (fraud); it is about tilting the pitch so the opposition is constantly running uphill.
Here is how Fidesz skews the landscape against challengers like Péter Magyar:
1. The Media “Star Chamber” (KESMA)
This is the single biggest hurdle for any challenger. Fidesz effectively nationalized the vast majority of private media.
The Structure: In 2018, over 470 media outlets (TV, radio, newspapers, online portals) were consolidated under a holding company called KESMA. It is run by Orbán loyalists.
The Impact: In rural Hungary, Fidesz narratives go unchallenged. Opposition figures are often banned from public television or are only mentioned in the context of smear campaigns. For Magyar to reach a rural voter, he has to physically go there, because the TV screen belongs to Fidesz.
2. Blurring Party vs. State Resources
In most democracies, there is a hard line between “Government Information” and “Party Campaigning.” In Hungary, that line has been erased.
The “Blue Posters”: You see those ubiquitous blue billboards with slogans like “Stop Brussels” or “No War.” These are paid for by the state budget (taxpayers) as “public service announcements.” However, the messaging is identical to the Fidesz campaign.
Financial Disparity: This allows Fidesz to effectively bypass campaign spending caps. While the opposition has a limited budget, Fidesz has the infinite resources of the Hungarian state treasury to amplify its message.
3. The “Winner Compensation” Rule
Hungary’s electoral law contains a unique quirk engineered by Fidesz in 2011 that mathematically favors the largest party.
How it works: In most mixed systems, “surplus” votes (votes cast for a winning candidate beyond what was needed to win) are discarded. In Hungary, these surplus votes are added to the party’s national list tally.
The Result: It creates a “supermajority multiplier.” If Fidesz wins a district, they get the seat plus extra points toward list seats. This helps explain how they can get ~52% of the popular vote but 67% of the seats in Parliament (the constitutional supermajority).
4. Gerrymandering
The constituency map was redrawn in 2011 to favor Fidesz demographics.
Diluting the Cities: Left-leaning or opposition-heavy urban districts (like in Budapest) were often packed with larger populations or redrawn to dilute their voting power, while rural, Fidesz-leaning districts require fewer votes to win a seat.
5. The Sovereignty Protection Office (SPO)
This is the newest tool (established recently, leading up to this 2026 cycle).
The Weapon: The SPO has broad powers to investigate any organization or individual accused of serving “foreign interests.”
The Chill: While they cannot prosecute directly, they can launch intrusive investigations, seize data, and publish damaging reports with no judicial oversight. It is designed specifically to target the “dollar media” and “dollar left” narrative, potentially paralyzing the funding networks of Magyar’s TISZA party right before the vote.
What about whataboutism…
Any evidence to back up your “Brussels” whataboutism? Of course not.
As we wait for @michaelsteiners overview re Western meddling, here is the factual track record of Russian election interference based on intelligence reports, forensic investigations, and government indictments:
United States (2016 & 2020)
The Internet Research Agency (IRA): A St. Petersburg-based “troll farm” conducted a massive social media campaign reaching 126 million Americans on Facebook alone. They created fake accounts to organize political rallies (for both sides) and spread polarizing content to exacerbate social racial and political divisions.
DNC Hacking: Russian military intelligence (GRU) units (specifically Unit 26165 and Unit 74455) hacked the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Clinton campaign chairman’s emails.
Leak Strategy: Stolen documents were strategically released via WikiLeaks and the persona “Guccifer 2.0” to dominate news cycles damaging to the Democratic candidate.
Mueller Report: The 2019 report resulted in the indictment of 12 Russian military intelligence officers and concluded that the interference occurred in a “sweeping and systematic fashion.”
France (2017 Presidential Election)
The “Macron Leaks”: Two days before the final vote, 9 gigabytes of emails from Emmanuel Macron’s campaign were hacked and leaked online.
Attribution: Cybersecurity firm Trend Micro and French authorities linked the attack to the “Pawn Storm” group (also known as APT28 or Fancy Bear), which is associated with the Russian GRU.
Forensics: Metadata in the leaked files contained Cyrillic characters and the name of a Russian intelligence employee, indicating a rushed operation.
Germany (2015 & 2017)
Bundestag Hack (2015): Hackers penetrated the German parliament’s network, stealing 16GB of data, including emails from MPs and Chancellor Angela Merkel’s parliamentary office.
Purpose: The data was harvested to be used for potential leverage or leaks during the 2017 federal election.
Attribution: In 2020, EU sanctions were issued against the head of the GRU (Igor Kostyukov) specifically for this cyberattack.
Eastern Europe & Balkans
Montenegro (2016): On the eve of the election, Serbian and Russian nationalists attempted a coup d’état to assassinate the Prime Minister and install a pro-Russian government to stop the country from joining NATO. Two Russian GRU officers were convicted in absentia by a Montenegrin court.
Moldova (2023-2024): Intelligence officials estimated Russia spent over €100 million to influence local elections and the EU referendum. Tactics included flying voters into the country, deepfake videos of President Maia Sandu, and funneling cash through the banned “Shor” party to buy votes.
Ukraine (2014): During the presidential election, hackers infiltrated the Central Election Commission and attempted to display false results declaring the far-right candidate Dmytro Yarosh the winner (the actual winner was Poroshenko). The fake results were broadcast on Russian state TV before the hack was fully mitigated.
European Parliament (2024 “Voice of Europe”)
Cash for Influence: Czech and Belgian intelligence uncovered a network centered around the “Voice of Europe” news portal based in Prague.
The Mechanism: The portal was used to funnel cash (hundreds of thousands of euros) to specific European politicians to promote pro-Russian narratives ahead of the EU elections.
Consequence: The network was sanctioned, and investigations were launched into MEPs from Germany (AfD) and other nations for accepting payments.
@michaelsteiner – looking forward to your reply.
(Did I mention I like weekends?)
MCC is a propaganda arm of the Fidesz party financed in large part through the government’s manipulation of MOL giving MCC equity ownership in MOL. This researcher’s days of getting research contracts with MCC are probably over due to MCC’s close affiliation with Fidesz. At the same time don’t be surprised to see people “defect” from Fidesz aligned institutions to oppose the party in the home stretch of this election campaign. A lot of people inside the system know the corruption and Russian influence that has been going on but have remained silent. Peter Magyar is obviously the big one who left the Fidesz system in 2024 to oppose it. Others will finally find the courage to act knowing this may be the last opportunity to regain a democratic system before it becomes almost impossible to throw out the mafia Orban autocracy.