Trump administration issues strong warning to PM Orbán over lucrative Russian deal

Change language:

Following repeated calls from Donald Trump, US Republican Senator Lindsey Graham has launched a scathing critique of Hungary and Slovakia for continuing to rely on Russian energy. 

According to Graham, most European countries have already reduced their oil and gas purchases from Moscow, so “it’s time” for Budapest and Bratislava to follow suit. The politician, a close ally of Trump, stated on social media that if Hungary and Slovakia do not end their imports of Russian oil, there will be “consequences”.

In recent days, the US President has repeatedly demanded that NATO countries immediately halt their purchase of Russian oil. He believes this is essential in order to apply serious pressure on Russia to end the war.

Trump argues that NATO members must act in unison to pressure Russia, and the key to this is cutting off access to global energy markets. “No excuses,” he previously stated, addressing European allies.

Hungary American pressure Russian oil
Donald Trump, Mike Pence and Lindsey Graham in the Oval Office of the White House. Image: Wikimedia Commons

Russian oil is now practically only bought by Hungary and Slovakia. I hope and expect they will soon take action so we can end this bloodshed. If not, there will be consequences – and there must be,” said Senator Lindsey Graham.

Why do Hungary and Slovakia cling to Russian oil?

Hungary and Slovakia received special exemptions from the European Union when the oil embargo was introduced in 2022. At the time, both countries argued that their energy supply would collapse if they had to shut off the Druzhba oil pipeline abruptly. This has since sparked ongoing controversy, as most EU states have switched to alternative sources, while Budapest and Bratislava continue to defend their concessions.

Hungary American pressure Russian crude oil refinery
According to expert estimates, approximately 80–90% of Hungary’s crude oil imports come from Russian sources. Image: depositphotos.com

The Hungarian government argues that MOL’s refineries are primarily designed to process Russian-grade “Urals” crude. Transitioning to other types of oil would be costly and require years of investment; MOL initially estimated that such a conversion would take two to four years and cost $500–700 million. Additionally, the country’s landlocked geography limits its options, as importing via sea would require transit through Croatia, which remains a point of political contention.

Is the Adriatic pipeline the solution? Croatian leader steps in

The Croatian alternative is not a new topic: during the EU oil embargo debates in 2022, it was already suggested that the Adriatic pipeline (JANAF) could cover Hungarian and Slovak needs. At the time, Zagreb indicated its willingness to supply millions of tonnes of oil to its neighbours, to which the Hungarian government responded sceptically. Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó has repeatedly stated that the Adriatic line’s capacity is insufficient and that Croatian transit fees are much higher than the cost of Russian imports.

Continue reading

7 Comments

  1. go MAGA go! 😀 im not sure if orban saw this coming. Trump does not have any real friend, so no exceptions should be done about the russian oil

  2. Emperor Palpatine Trump and Senator Graham should take care of their own problems at home. Hungary is not a vassal state of The USA. Frankly the US empire and its bullying the rest of the planet hopefully will soon be a thing of the past. America is a dying empire just like, The UK, Rome, Greece, Egypt and numerous others. America will not be missed by the rest of the planet.

  3. The EU should step in and provide some financial assistance to Hungary to convert its’ refineries to usage of non-Russian oil. Once you provide that there is no more excuse and all that is left is Fidesz’ allegiance to Moscow.

    • I think that more than refinery re-arrangements may play a rôle in Hungary’s obstinacy. I have commented on this in a separate post — I hope that you will take a look at it.

  4. Here is a set of circumstances on which the article does not remark :

    Russian oil is cheaper than oil from other sources. Yet petrol in Hungary is not cheaper than petrol in, say, Austria, which does not use Russian oil. Why ? Because the Hungarian refiner, MOL, is substantially owned by the Hungarian state, and the profits from MOL prop up the national budget — “buy low, sell high”. If Hungary had to source her oil more expensively and did not wish to cut services and activities, she would have to find money elsewhere than in MOL profits, as in higher taxation . . . or MOL would have to raise retail prices for petrol and for other products of oil refining, such as diesel fuel. Unpolitical political consequences !

    Any capital expenditures at refineries to alter distillation proceedings would be additional.

  5. Er wordt hier niks gezegd over de prijzen , als expat uit België die mee doet aan de russische boycot weet ik dat dat land nu afhankelijk is van amerikaanse olie, en dat een gemiddeld gezin het zesvoudige moet betalen aan energie kosten + doorboven nog extre belasting voor het tnransport over zee !! Dan zouden de energie prijzen voor de Hongaren onbetaalbaar worden.!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *