A plant manager at a groundworks contractor in the Fens had been running the kit since 2013, give or take, and head office had mostly left him to it. The tracker project wasn’t his idea. It came down from above in late 2024 as part of a fuel cost review, and the pitch wasn’t the GPS dot on a map most of the industry had in mind when somebody said trackers, but a system that compared engine hours against actual machine movement and flagged any gap that opened between the two. He had thirty machines on the books, split across three live sites around Spalding, the kit mostly excavators with the dumpers and a couple of wheel loaders behind them, the spread groundworks needed. He’d been expecting the data to confirm what he already knew from ten years on these yards, but three months in, by February 2025, the figures had stopped lining up with anything he was watching on site, and head office, when he sent them up the chain, were stuck on the numbers too. Across the fleet, 43 percent of every hour the engines had been on, nothing had been moving, not creeping forward, not loading, just sat with the engine running. They had two people recheck the categorisation before anyone was willing to take the figure to the next meeting.
Sponsored content
43 percent is high. It isn’t, unfortunately, as far above the sector average as you’d hope. The numbers coming back from other large construction fleets land somewhere between 28 and 45 percent of operating hours, with the variance coming down to the work and the season. On a 36 tonne excavator with an idle burn of roughly a gallon of diesel an hour, multiply that across 1000 engine hours a year with 40 percent of those running idle, and the machine has put 400 gallons of diesel through itself doing no work at all. Loaders are usually the worst offenders. They get longer warm up periods at the start of a shift, and operators leave them ticking over between cycles because shutting down and restarting feels like effort. The Construction Leadership Council’s 2023 analysis put the UK site average at 45 percent idle while switched on, and its targets for 2024 and 2025 were calling for reductions toward 15 percent. His fleet was nowhere near the better end of that target.
What the aggregate didn’t tell him, the site by site split did. The drainage contract east of Spalding on agricultural land came back at 51 percent idle, which traced to the schedule, with machines on hold for concrete deliveries or waiting for the water table to come down enough to dig again, and nobody on the ground bothering to shut engines off in between. From where the operators were standing, you can’t always tell whether the next wait is going to be ten minutes or two hours, and he could see why nobody on the ground was reaching for the keys. The housing foundation job further north came in at 38 percent, more or less where he’d have called it without any data. A road widening job near Boston came in at 29 percent. The individual machine data was where it got more interesting, with a couple of dumpers running over 60 percent idle for six straight weeks on the same drainage contract, and the pattern traced back to one site foreman who let engines stay on through meal breaks and ran morning handovers that sometimes pushed past forty minutes. No procedure said to do this, and no procedure said not to.
Total fuel and total engine hours are numbers any operator can pull off the books at month end without any tracking system, but neither tells you which of those engine hours actually produced any work and which were just diesel disappearing into a parked machine nobody got round to switching off, which is a point I’ve heard a fleet tracking specialist at gpswox.com make to a meeting of operators and stop the room cold. The alternative to site level idle monitoring is somebody walking the yard with a clipboard, and a fair number of operations across the East of England in 2025 were still being managed that way, catching an idling machine if the clipboard happens to walk past it, but missing the structural idle baked into a schedule nobody has had reason to question.
Putting a fuel cost on the figure wasn’t quick work. Each machine had its own burn rate, and what it was doing on a given day moved the rate, with cold mornings and wandering diesel prices both pushing it further, so any flat number used in the calculation would have come out wrong by some margin. £3.10 an hour was where finance came out on the blended idle cost, worked up from roughly 1.8 litres burned at idle and a delivered diesel price hovering near 140 pence at the pump, with a small allowance for cold starts and the warm up swing. From November 2024 through October the following year, the fleet had logged something past 62000 engine hours when finance pulled the totals, and the 43 percent idle figure put roughly 26600 of those hours on the books as machinery switched on and did nothing, which at £3.10 each came out to an annual idle fuel bill somewhere north of £82000. He’d estimated the idle fuel cost before the GPS trackers were fitted, working it out on the back of an envelope, at around £30000. He said the figure didn’t look real the first time it came up on the screen.
Operators usually undershoot their idle fuel costs when you ask them. His was a wider undershot than most I’ve seen. Of any sector, construction is probably the hardest to spot idle hours in without instruments. The day is too variable to eyeball from the ground. Machines queue between movements. Sometimes one will be sitting idle because the next bit of the job is on somebody else’s clock. Some get parked through a passing rain shower with the engine left on. In winter, half the running engines on a site at any moment are running because the cab needs to be warm enough to sit in. A dumper on one of his drainage jobs clocked eight hours running on a single shift last winter, four of those parked at the spoil heap waiting for the next move from the excavator, and walking any site by mid morning and there’s ticking from a dozen machines in the air that nobody on the ground registers as anything other than the normal noise of the work.
The trackers didn’t immediately change how any of his sites ran. The data came in across February, but it wasn’t until a site meeting in April that idle time made it onto an actual agenda for the first time, and it wasn’t until June that one of the housing sites put a written rule up about engines off through meal breaks and handover windows. The idle figure on that site fell from 38 to around 24 percent over the quarter that followed, although the week to week was uneven enough that he wasn’t ready to call it a clean result yet. The drainage site near Spalding stayed at 49 percent through the summer, with the schedule not having moved and the wait times pushing the figure up not having moved either. The two dumpers that had been running above 60 percent got down to around 35 percent once the foreman saw the data, but the foreman spent about three months arguing that the idle fuel cost figures were overstated and the whole thing wasn’t worth the attention it was getting.
Maintenance hadn’t been part of the plan going in. Idling for hours on end leaves its own wear marks, cylinder glazing being the obvious one, with incomplete combustion at low load underneath it. Engine life is usually quoted in productive hours, but idle hours still tick up the service interval counters anyway. One of the excavators came up on its 2000 hour service six weeks before the manager had it pencilled in, and the logs traced back to a cold stretch in February when the machine had been parked on standby for a job that kept slipping a week, with somebody starting the engine each morning so the cab was warm enough to sit in. He had sent a question up the chain back in May about whether the service schedules ought to be reworked to count idle hours separately from productive ones. He still hadn’t had an answer back last time we spoke.
Disclaimer: the author(s) of the sponsored article(s) are solely responsible for any opinions expressed or offers made. These opinions do not necessarily reflect the official position of Daily News Hungary, and the editorial staff cannot be held responsible for their veracity.
