Pros and Cons of the quota system

It is obvious that more and more immigrants are flooding into Europe; the problem is that no one has offered a valid solution for what to do with this problem yet. The quota system that is highly praised by Angela Merkel has its upsides and downsides; the aim of this article is to briefly analyse the pros and cons of this idea.

The basis of the quota system is that based on the size and population of a country, a certain number of immigrants would be relocated to other European countries. This currently means that 54 000 immigrants would be transported from Hungary to other European countries. The problem is that immigrants do not stay in Hungary; they move to other countries as soon as possible. Also, it’s almost impossible to tell how many immigrants are in Hungary or in Europe; many of them refuses to identify themselves, and were not registered at all, as in the case of Greece. Thousands of people are wandering around in Europe without any papers at all.

In theory, two lists would be created – one for those countries which are highly dangerous, and one for those which are safe. People from danger zones would be automatically registered and be investigated, while those from the safe zones would be automatically declined and labelled as economic migrants. Those who are accepted would be placed in another country based on their qualifications, their knowledge of languages, and their ties to the target country (if they have any). Receiving countries would be also ranked based on their economy, their rate of unemployment, and their exposure to immigration.

The problem with this system is the growing number of immigrants. Europe would be divided into registered and unregistered immigrants and it would be hard to follow who migrated and where. Also, investigating each and every immigrant’s case, their background, and then begin negotiations with the target country – it would soon become a never ending story.