Readers’ letters: Historical reasons behind Hungary’s reaction to the Syrian refugees
“We shouldn’t forget that the people who are coming here grew up in a different religion and represent a completely different culture – most are not Christians, but Muslims.” This was how Hungarian Prime Minister’s, Victor Orban, described the flow of Syrian refugees to Europe. He claimed Europe, and European culture, have Christian roots. “I think we have a right to decide that we do not want a large number of Muslim people in our country,” he added “We do not like the consequences of having a large number of Muslim communities that we see in other countries.”
Orban attributed his thoughts to knowing how it is to live together with Muslim communities, referring to the Ottoman Empire that once occupied Hungary for some 150 years.
Orban gave this speech as he announced a three-year of jail time awaiting those who dare to climb over the new wire-fence built along the borders of Hungary and Serbia.
The Hungarian police spokeswoman, Viktoria Csiszer-Kovacs, outlawed the Hungarians who attempt to help refugees cross the border.
Despite of Orban’s remarks, Hungarians NGOs, such as Migráns Szolidaritás Csoport (Migrant Solidarity Group) and Migration Aid stood to defend the right to Asylum and help refugees to ratify Hungary’s reputation as a racist country.
Orban’s reaction towards the refugee crisis seemed to be baseless. Muslims in Hungary represent less than one percent of the total population at the moment. Moreover, to Syrian refugees Hungary is nothing but a transit for they have no intention to settle there. However, Orabn did stress on what he called “historical experience”, which indicates that his opinion roots back in history.
In 1521 and 1541, Ottomans invaded Hungary. The Kingdom of Hungary was then divided. The west and the north were ruled by Hungarians and named the Royal Hungary. On the other hand, the central and southern parts were ruled by the Ottomans. The eastern part was alone ruled by another Hungarian king who named his regime, the Eastern Hungarian Kingdom.
Nearly three million Hungarians were taken as slaves. Nobles had to emigrate to Royal Hungary. The countryside became almost unpopulated. Some 80,000 Muslim settlers moved to Hungary and even invited more people throughout the 16th century. These settlers took over the country and became administrators, soldiers, artisans and merchants. Towards the end of the occupation, the number of ethnic Hungarians was greatly reduced, due to massacres and deportations.
Ottomans were described to be tolerant about religion where they did not prohibit Christianity. Secondary and academic theological schools -called medreses- filled in for the church, teaching church law and natural sciences, not only the Islamic religion.
However, some historians disagree. Sir Thomas Walker Arnold, a British historian of Islamic art, a 17th centaury’s author said: “Meanwhile he [the Turk] wins [converts] by craft more than by force, and snatches away Christ by fraud out of the hearts of men. For the Turk, it is true, at the present time compels no country by violence to apostatise; but he uses other means whereby imperceptibly he roots out Christianity.”
In terms of economy, the majority of the noble class moved to Royal Hungry when they lost their lands to the Ottoman rulers, who applied high taxes. Although some economic sectors developed under the Ottoman occupation, the region has suffered economically, as almost the entire revenues were controlled by the Ottoman Empire.
When Habsburg conquered the Ottoman parts of Hungry to free them, Hungarians wanted to revenge. They went to the streets and destroyed most of the Ottoman works and took over what was left. The once was the mosque of Pasha Qasim in the Hungarian city of Pécs is now used as a Catholic church.
The few of the Turkish steam baths that survived are still operating till now. At least 75 hammams, such as the Rudas Baths in the Hungarian nowadays capital, Budapest, are considered to be remarkable tourist attractions.
When Orban attributed his statements to religion, he probably meant that he is eager to defend the Hungarian European identity that descends from Christianity, not to defend Christianity itself.
Orban’s logic should not be attacked by Arabs. It is common for many of them to resort to religious Islamic discourse, in order to manipulate people, not for the sake of preserving our identity – but for imposing their hidden interests.
Orban’s statements revealed his fear of another Muslim invasion, but this is not the case here. Although the majority of Syrians (Arabs) and Turks are Muslims, they are totally different ethnics.
From a Hungarian point of view, Hungary has a limited culture, yet they thrive to spread it peacefully by inviting people from the Hungarian parts located in Serbia, Romani and Ukraine, as well as inviting citizens from Turkey, Palestine, Egypt and Syria. This small country is not ready for another cultural invasion.
We have to keep in mind that Hungary is somehow an isolated country. It barely gets involved in international issues. The Hungarian Ambassador to Egypt, Peter Kveck, commented on the new Egyptian government saying that PM Vicktor Orbán said Hungary is not going to lecture anybody, because each and every country has its own traditions. He added that what has been considered a successful model in Europe and Hungary does not have to be successful in Egypt or other countries.
It seems that this small country, Hungary, was not prepared for the flow of the Syrians refugees. Its small economy is not strong enough to absorb this huge number of refugees.
Hungary was internationally blamed, and it was called racist. However, if it was, why did it open the door once before to the Muslim Bosnian refugees!
Other European countries strongly support the Syrian refugees such as Austria. The demonstration held in Vienna on the 31st of August in solidarity with the refugees against the ill-treatment they received in Hungary, was a great proof of the Austrian’s support.
But the question now is: If Suleyman’s siege of Vienna in 1529 was a success; would Austria be treating refugees the same way?
Arabs should stop judging people and nations. If someone it to be blamed, judged, or punished, it should rather be the person behind all of this aftermath, the Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.
In 2008 under the presidency of Hosni Mubarak, the government decided to close its borders with Palestine when they were being killed by Israeli bombings. Some Egyptians were in favour of this decision. They once said that Palestinians will ruin the Egyptian identity. Those, especially, should not blame Orban for his position from the current crisis.
By Maydaa Abo El-Nadar
Photo by Balazs Beli
Source: Daily News Hungary
please make a donation here
Hot news
Attention: Tick species spreading destructive virus appears in Hungary
Mini Dubai: Draft intergovernmental agreement goes before Hungarian parliament
What happened today in Hungary? — 28 March, 2024
Hungary opens diplomatic mission in Tanzania
Direct flights between Budapest and this exotic capital from April!
See Budapest’s famous shopping street rejuvenated – PHOTOS