Ukraine

FM Szijjártó: All Hungary’s criteria for starting EU accession talks with Ukraine included in framework document

szijjártó ukraine eu Paks

All of the criteria defined by Hungary have been incorporated in the EU framework document drafted on starting accession talks with Ukraine, Péter Szijjártó, the foreign minister, said on Facebook on Friday evening.

He referred to heavy debates in the EU in the past days and weeks over the sort of criteria Brussels should set for starting those talks.

Szijjártó reiterated Hungary’s position that respecting the rights of national minorities by Ukraine should be set as a criterion “for any further steps”.

“Some member states did not want to hear about this criterion, but we made it clear that we insist on restoring the rights to the ethnic Hungarian community to preserve their national identity, the use of their mother tongue and to Hungarian language education,” the foreign minister said.

Welcoming the agreement reached on Friday evening in Brussels on incorporating of all of the criteria set by Hungary, Szijjártó said “we now have a document from Brussels establishing that Ukraine must restore the rights taken away from ethnic Hungarians in Transcarpathia over the past years”.

Andrea Bocskor, an MEP of ruling Fidesz for Transcarpathia, on Saturday, called the adoption of the document a “significant Hungarian diplomatic success”, which she said was a serious achievement for Transcarpathian Hungarians in terms of regaining their rights lost in recent years.

She noted that Ukraine must draw up a minority action plan with the involvement of Hungarian representatives and resolve the problems listed in the 11 points presented by the Hungarian foreign ministry which would also be reviewed by the European Commission.

Viktória Ferenc, also an MEP of ruling Fidesz, said that “it fills me with joy and confidence that the legal protection of Transcarpathian Hungarians is officially part of Ukraine’s accession process, and this way it is no longer a bilateral but a European issue”.

Read also:

The election strengthened the government, says Hungarian minister

viktor orbán ep elections

Sunday’s local and European parliamentary elections have strengthened the government and given it a strong mandate to continue “spreading the message of peace” in international relations, the head of the Prime Minister’s Office told a regular press briefing on Thursday.

Without a boost to its pro-peace stance, the government “would have been unable to keep Hungary out of NATO’s military mission in Ukraine,” Gergely Gulyás said.

The “fair” agreement between Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg earlier this week, which maintained Hungarian interests, was partly thanks to the election results, Gulyás said.

“Hungarian money, weapons or soldiers will not participate in the NATO mission in Ukraine,” Gulyás said, adding that the government saw the mission as extremely dangerous that could end in the war spreading to larger areas, “in Hungary’s immediate neighbourhood”.

Hungary continues to provide asylum to those fleeing the war, he added.

Speaking about the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union to fine Hungary 200 million euros for not complying with EU legislations on asylum and on returning illegal immigrants to their home countries, Gulyás called the ruling “outrageous, unfair and unacceptable”.

The minister said the ruling contradicted EU law, was incompatible with Hungary’s constitution and penalised the country which had rejected illegal migration from the beginning, protecting its own and Europe’s external borders.

This ruling “could never have been passed by a normal court,” he added.

Gulyás noted that the ruling went beyond the original claim of the complainant. The European Commission requested a condemnation of 7 million euros and a daily fine of 6 million euros until compliance, whereas the court ordered Hungary to pay a lump sum of 200 million euros and a daily fine of 1 million euros, that is seventy times the fine originally requested.

The ruling goes completely against everything we think about European law, the Hungarian constitution, the protection of external borders and effective action against migration, Gulyás said.

Government spokeswoman Eszter Vitalyos said that over the past two weeks, 310 billion forints (EUR 780m) worth of investments, supported with government funds, were opened in Hungary.

Out of 84 large projects, 125 billion forints were spent on public road infrastructure development, including 116 billion forints on a bridge spanning the Danube between Kalocsa and Paks and 2.5 billion forints for an M1 motorway exit at Paty.

Regarding health care, she highlighted Pecs University’s new emergency medical centre for children which received 2.7 billion forints in government support.

A total of 14 billion forints worth of investments were carried out in culture and public education, including 12 billion forints for the revamp of a Tisza castle in Geszt.

She added that a tourism development project has been completed in the Szolnok castle and a 700 metre long bridge dubbed the bridge of national cohesion was opened in Satoraljaujhely.

Company development investments included a 115 billion forint grant to a capacity expansion at an electric parts plant in Szolnok, in central Hungary, a 80 billion forint expansion of energy drink maker Hell’s plant in Szikszó, Vitalyos said. Other grants supported family-friendly and education investments at a pilgrimage site in Matraverebely, in northern Hungary, in Miskolc, Karcag and other localities.

A home renovation programme is also in the works, with the tender opening for the public in July, she said.

Fielding a question on the recount of the votes cast on the Budapest mayor candidates on Sunday, Gulyás said it was in everyone’s interest with such a close race that the result should be legitimate and beyond doubt. He said he expected the recount to clearly decide who won the election.

Gulyás said there were many ways of looking at the election results. Compared to the previous election, the governing parties won less in percentage terms but that came after two challenging years of war, an energy crisis and economic difficulties. After two years like this, “we achieved the best result in Europe and received more votes than ever in a European parliamentary election”, indeed, more than the parties that finished in second, third and fourth places combined, he added.

On the opposition Momentum party’s election result, he said it was good news that a party that “proudly and openly betrayed its country” did not clear the 5 percent parliamentary threshold. On the president of DK, he said Fidesz had been working since 2004 to ensure that Ferenc Gyurcsany plays a decreasing role on the left and his position has finally weakened.

Assessing the result of the European parliamentary election, Gulyás said that on the whole, he could see a shift to the right, but warned that the sovereigntist forces had not yet gained a majority. He said it would be desirable if the sovereigntists could form a party group within the European Parliament, but added that was still questionable.

He said it would become clear in a few weeks which party group Fidesz could join in the European Parliament.

Among the European Conservatives and Reformers, the majority would welcome Fidesz, he said, noting that they had wanted Fidesz to join already after it left the European People’s Party. “It was our decision to try to create a larger right-wing alliance and this still remains our goal but it may not be successful,” he said.

On the election result of the party of French president Emmanuel Macron, Gulyás said that those with the most pro-war position suffered the biggest defeat. It seems the French public could not identify with the plan of sending French soldiers to Ukraine, he said.

Gulyás said the spotlight would come off Hungary if “we joined the supporters of war, opened our borders to migration and were willing to hold gender briefings in kindergartens,” but the government is not willing to do these.

Fielding a question on possible cooperation between Fidesz and Germany’s AfD, he said such a possibility had not even been suggested.

On the European People’s Party, he cited the EPP’s “pro-war position” as the main criticism. It seems the EPP evaluates the election result as a success, partly rightfully so, he said, adding that the EPP was looking for cooperation with the left and the liberals.

Gulyás said it was inconceivable that the Tisza Party could sit in the same party group, the EPP, with KDNP, the junior member of the governing Fidesz-KDNP alliance, in the European Parliament. He said this could happen in two ways: either Tisza is not accepted by the EPP or KDNP leaves the group.

He emphasised that Fidesz had no plans to cooperate with Tisza in the Budapest City Council.

On the composition of the City Council and the ability to obtain the majority necessary for passing the budget, for example, he said there were many parties that won enough votes to send deputies into the City Council and some of these had loose party affiliations, so it could be expected that there could still be many changes in the assembly and it would not be impossible at all to obtain a majority for a budget.

On Fidesz-KDNP’s candidate for Budapest mayor, he said Alexandra Szentkiralyi wished to continue to work on the affairs of Budapest in future so she was expected to become the leader of Fidesz’s group in the City Council. On Szentkiralyi’s withdrawal from the race, he said she had withdrawn voluntarily and unilaterally and Dávid Vitézy could rightly say that he had not asked for this and did not owe the governing parties anything.

Gulyás assessed Budapest mayor Gergely Karácsony’s performance in the past five years as a complete failure, he said Vitézy could only do better in comparison.

He said they did not plan to limit the powers of the mayors who were defeated in the municipal elections before their successors take office in October, and this would not be constitutional anyway.

Concerning Ilaria Salis’s winning a mandate in the EP, Gulyás said the election of the antifa activist, a “common law criminal” being prosecuted for violent acts in Budapest “does not present a too positive image of Italian democracy and part of their voters”. He said if the EP suspended the immunity of its new member, the proceedings could be continued against her; should the EP fail to do so, the proceedings will be interrupted.

Asked about Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s earlier remarks calling for “occupying Brussels” in the light of the EP election’s results, Gulyás said “we have set foot; we have not occupied it yet, but we are in” adding that “perhaps at least another EP election will be needed” to complete “the great military manoeuvre”.

Concerning Hungary’s upcoming EU presidency, Gulyás said it would give increased focus to the community’s competitiveness, agricultural and cohesion policies as well as to demographic challenges.

Referring to a visit by the NATO chief to Budapest on Wednesday, Gulyás said Jens Stoltenberg’s talks with the prime minister had yielded “maximum results” as “Hungary could maintain its “pro-peace position”. He said NATO was mulling training troops for the war and providing equipment to them, but “the military mission would probably not end there and those participating in it will be obliged to contribute to common defence under (NATO’s) Article 5, which could involve armed operations outside the country,” Gulyás said.

Without a fast peace agreement, NATO will under its Ukrainian mission “enter Ukraine’s western parts possibly as a peace keeper”, Gulyás said but insisted that “Hungary will not participate”. He also said, however, that if Russia should attack another NATO country on its own territory “and the conflict is not linked to NATO’s Ukraine mission, Hungary will participate in that.”

“Hungary’s NATO membership is a good thing and the government does not want to quit; Hungary … is meeting its NATO commitments,” Gulyás said, but added, however, that “NATO has overstepped the boundaries a defence alliance should not cross”.

Gulyás excluded the possibility of sending Lynx armoured vehicles, manufactured also in Hungary, to Ukraine “in the foreseeable future”.

He said “there is no sign” of other NATO members staying away from the Ukraine mission, adding that Stoltenberg’s Wednesday agreement would be binding for the next NATO chief, too. He also said Wednesday’s talks had not touched upon Stoltenberg’s successor. “If the other members insist on Dutch PM Mark Rutte, he will have to do something to get Hungary’s support,” Gulyás added.

Asked if Hungary would refrain from vetoing the EU’s decisions concerning Ukraine after its agreement with NATO, Gulyás said “the two things are not connected”.

Gulyás was also asked when Hungarian troops would be sent to Chad. He said there wasn’t any “exact timetable” prepared. He said talks were underway “aimed at having a (Hungarian) military mission in Chad”.

Asked about Hungary’s recent repurchasing majority ownership in Budapest Liszt Ferenc International Airport, Gulyás said the national economy ministry and the owners would provide information about the project in early July. He said the objective was to build a new terminal with the aim to increase the number of foreign tourists to over 20 million, adding that “with a well-developed infrastructure including a fast train service between the city and the airport, the goal of even 30 million visitors can be achieved”. Gulyás said that at times of war, posing a national security risk “it is reassuring” to have the a majority ownership in the airport.

Asked whether further plans still involved selling 29 percent of the airport to investors from Qatar, Gulyás said “the ownership structure is currently not like that.”

“The state part of the transaction will be closer to the ranges of 1,000 billion forints,” he added.

Speaking about restoring the balance of the central budget, Gulyás said the word austerity “is not included in the government’s vocabulary”.

Asked to comment on the recent weakening of the forint, he noted “a hectic volatility of the euro-forint exchange rate”, adding that “a return to economic growth will in the long term ensure that such hectic changes should not occur at all or occur only a lot less frequently”.

Commenting on the recent resignation of the culture and innovation minister, Gulyás said it was not related to the elections. He said the prime minister had not planned any further reshuffle in the cabinet.

Regarding the European import duties imposed on Chinese electric vehicles and opposed by Hungary, Gulyás said that “Europe will not win but loose on the whole issue, if China introduces similar duties”.

Asked about the planned national vaccine production plant in Debrecen, he said it was in the ownership of Debrecen University and “will be completed soon” in the city in eastern Hungary.

Speaking about the upcoming peace conference on Ukraine to be held by Switzerland, Gulyás said Hungary would be represented by the foreign minister.

Asked about the possibility of a meeting between the Ukrainian president and the Hungarian prime minister, he said “it will not be on the agenda as long as no results can be expected from it”.

Read also:

Hungary at risk: potential exclusion from key NATO group – UPDATE: Romanian president

bucharest nine 2023 nato

Could Hungary be in trouble within NATO? The Bucharest Nine plans to exclude Hungary from its members as it is not cooperative enough.

As Financial Times reports, diplomats from the Bucharest Nine (B9) group, comprising Eastern European NATO and EU member states, are contemplating the exclusion of Hungary from future meetings, according to sources familiar with the discussions.

Bucharest Nine (B9)

bucharest nine 2023 nato
The Bucharest Nine (B9) in 2023. Photo: MTI/Koszticsák Szilárd

The B9, established in 2015, includes Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia. These countries, once part of the Soviet Union or the Warsaw Pact, now coordinate security policies as NATO and EU members, particularly focusing on their eastern borders, Privátbankár writes.

Recently, Hungary has blocked the group’s joint statements supporting increased aid to Ukraine and NATO’s measures to enhance military assistance to Ukraine or expedite its membership process. Hungary’s stance on Ukraine and its accession talks has increasingly frustrated its allies.

The B9 leaders are meeting on 11 June in Riga, and officials anticipate Hungary will once again refuse to endorse a declaration agreed upon by the others.

Talks to exclude Hungary “very serious”

Talks about potentially excluding Hungary are described as “very serious,” with one source noting, “This is likely the last time we meet in this format.” Another source highlighted the “tough” debates in recent meetings, suggesting that future meetings will be challenging to organise unless Hungary becomes more cooperative.

The Financial Times also highlighted that last month, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán stated Hungary aims to “redefine” its NATO membership terms, opposing the alliance’s support for Ukraine in the ongoing war.

“Hungary has been invited to the B9 summit in Riga on June 11,” the Lithuanian presidential office confirmed, emphasizing that “for the unity of NATO and the EU, it is important for Hungary to remain within the group.”

Reuters: Sulyok did not attend

bucharest nine riga summit 11 june
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, Latvian President Edgars Rinkēvičs, Romanian President Klaus Iohannis and Polish President Andrzej Duda (left-right) at the summit of the Heads of State and Government of the Bucharest Nine (B9), a group of NATO member states from Central and Eastern Europe, in Riga, 11 June 2024. Photo: MTI/EPA-PAP/Pawel Supernak

Meanwhile, the Reuters news agency reported that

President Tamás Sulyok would not attend Tuesday’s presidential-level meeting.

Instead, the country will be represented by Hungary’s ambassador to Lithuania, and therefore no joint statement is expected at the end of the event, Index writes.

NATO Secretary General visits Budapest

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who is attending the Riga summit, will visit Budapest soon on Wednesday to discuss “Hungary’s omission from the Alliance’s mission in Ukraine”, Viktor Orbán said in an interview with state television on Monday.

On Tuesday morning, it was announced on NATO’s website that Stoltenberg will indeed visit Hungary, and a spokesman for the organisation shared the information on X:

As reported, Jens Stoltenberg will hold a joint press conference with Viktor Orbán on Wednesday morning at 10.10.

UPDATE: Romanian president’s reaction (10.45 PM 11 June)

The Romanian head of state has denied that the Bucharest Nine (B9), which brings together the member states of NATO’s eastern wing, are considering excluding Hungary because the Hungarian government allegedly “regularly opposes” the decisions of its partners, Portfolio reports.

Klaus Iohannis, who attended the B9 Heads of State and Government meeting, was interviewed by Romanian journalists in Riga on the above-mentioned topic. “No, there was no question of any exclusion and there will be no question of any exclusion. This is fake news,” the Romanian president said.

“It is not the first time that a state has not been represented by the president, although it would be desirable to have the highest possible level of representation. The two states in question were represented institutionally by ambassadors, so diplomatically there is no problem. As for the conclusions of the summit, they were indeed not agreed by one Member State. But there is an agreed procedure for this, which we also have in the European Union, that when a common language cannot be found, the leaders of the meeting can issue a statement on behalf of those gathered. This is what happened here,” the Romanian president explained.

Iohannis added: “This is not a problem because the B9 is a consultative forum, it does not make decisions.” “We consult each other, we formulate points of view that we believe will improve the functioning of NATO”, the Romanian head of state pointed out.

Read also:

32 Ukrainians detained for illegally crossing into Hungary in fake military truck

ukraine truck

On June 9, a GAZ-66 truck bearing military license plates illegally crossed the Ukrainian-Hungarian border in the Transcarpathia region, known for its Hungarian population. Hungarian police later detained 32 Ukrainian citizens near the village of Barabás, Hungary. An investigation into the incident is currently underway.

Local Ukrainian journalist Vitaliy Glagola first reported the incident, sharing a photo of the truck as it crossed the border.

The Ukrainian Border Guard Service clarified that the truck did not belong to the armed forces, suggesting that the license plates were likely fake. Several individuals suspected of involvement in the incident were also detained.

The illegal transportation of draft-age men out of Ukraine is a growing issue, as martial law currently prohibits them from leaving the country. Thousands are attempting to escape to Hungary, Romania, and Moldova. Romanian police reports indicate that since February 2022, over 11,000 people have crossed illegally from Ukraine. Many of these attempts involve crossing the Tisza River by swimming, a perilous endeavor that has resulted in at least 24 drownings.

  • read also: Slovenia extends controls at Hungarian and Croatian borders, details HERE

Orbán wants to stay out of NATO mission in Ukraine

Hungarian Foreign minister about Orbán Viktor

Hungary must stay out of a NATO mission in Ukraine at all costs, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said in an interview to public radio on Friday.

He said Hungary should not even “dip its toe” in the planning phase, adding there was a risk that Hungarian military units could be transferred to NATO command if the alliance mission in Ukraine were to get under way, and Hungarian territory used for the mission.

“We’d lose a vital part of our sovereignty if that happened … and then we wouldn’t be able to keep the Hungarian troops out of the war,” he said.

Orbán said the point at which Hungary withdrew from all NATO preparations for a Ukraine mission was “very close”, adding that such a step must be first discussed with the alliance’s current and future secretary-general.

“We must make clear that Hungary has the right to stick to the NATO basic treaty that we joined,” he said, noting that it was defined as a defence treaty.

Read also:

Foreign minister Szijjártó: Hungary to attend Ukraine peace summit in Switzerland

szijjártó minister pro-peace

Hungary will attend the Ukraine peace summit due to start on June 15 in Switzerland at the foreign ministerial level, Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó said in St. Petersburg on Thursday, adding that the government regretted that the summit will not be attended by both warring sides.

Szijjártó said Hungary’s participation at the peace conference was driven by the country’s “absolute position on the side of peace”, and it attended all events where peace was on the agenda.

At the same time, he expressed his regret that the conference would be held without the participation of Russia. Hungary, he said, believed that a real result could only be expected if both sides were sat at the negotiating table.

This will not be the case this time, he said, according to a ministry statement, adding, however, that Hungary respected Switzerland’s efforts and will attend the conference at the foreign ministerial level.

Szijjártó later spoke at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum about the need to broker peace as soon as possible and the negative consequences of the war in Ukraine.

“We urge and pray for an immediate ceasefire,” Szijjártó said. “We urge and pray for peace talks to take place because we do believe that under peaceful circumstances we might be able to develop much quicker and much more smoothly, and life will again be calmer and more peaceful in Europe if we can put peace in the forefront of international politics.”

Read also:

FM Szijjártó welcomes Brazil-China statement on Ukraine war

szijjártó ukraine eu Paks

Hungary welcomes the statement signed by Brazil and China on how to resolve the war in Ukraine, Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó said in St Petersburg on Thursday, saying the statement promoted peace in the country, which was in Hungary’s interest.

Speaking to journalists on the sidelines of the St Petersburg International Economic Forum, Szijjártó said the statement signed by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Celso Amorim, the Brazilian president’s chief adviser on foreign policy, was a step forward because it addressed ways to promote peace. “Therefore we welcome, appreciate and value this common statement,” he said.

He said Hungary’s government agreed that the solution could not be found on the battlefield and could only be brought about through negotiations.

Szijjártó said the government was concerned by the statements by some European leaders on the possible use of nuclear weapons. “We do hope that no one is going to think about it seriously.”

“We also agree with the approach that nuclear energy facilities need to be protected,” Szijjarto Szijjártó said. Cooperation in nuclear energy is not subject to European Union sanctions and Hungary’s government will reject any restrictions in the sector, he said.

Hungary’s energy needs, he added, could only be met with nuclear energy in the mix, noting that its Paks plant is fueled by Russian fuel, “which is thus key to a safe energy supply”, he said.

“It is not only that we do not support sanctions; we are interested in further improving our nuclear cooperation with Russia,” he said.

Read also:

Hungarian government using aid to Ukraine to blackmail the EU?

zelensky orbán

The Hungarian government has pushed back on EU measures to send aid to Ukraine on several occasions. While in March and May, the country’s delegation refrained from vetoing the enlargement of the European Peace Facility, the government is now actively blocking payments from reaching Ukraine.

Aid to Ukraine is on hold due to Hungary

One of the European Union’s main instruments to support Ukraine is the so-called European Peace Facility (EPF), which allows for military assistance to non-EU members. The EPF was created in 2021 to finance the EU’s common foreign and security policy, mainly the prevention and management of crises, peacebuilding, and peacekeeping in third countries. Missions financed by the EPF include, for example, peacekeeping in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

At the same time, it is now the fund used to aid arms purchases of the Ukrainian army, with more than EUR 11 billion allocated by member states for assistance – with the latest expansion of the EPF accepted with Hungary abstaining in the vote.

As G7 writes in a recent analysis, EPF aid to Ukraine is currently a matter of great urgency: the intensifying Russian artillery and air offensive is forcing Ukraine to buy more weapons, and since “the overwhelming majority of EU member states consider the survival of Ukraine and the deterrence of Russian aggression to be of vital European security interest,” the implementation of the fund is an important agenda for the union.

This is why the Hungarian government’s latest attempts to block payments are a great political frustration for the bloc. As not only the expansion of the EPF but also the individual payments within it must be unanimously agreed on by member states, Hungary’s refusal to accept the flow of aid to Ukraine has, according to Bloomberg and POLITICO, held back EUR 6.5 billion from reaching the war-torn country.

zelensky orbán aid to ukraine
Viktor Orbán and Volodymyr Zelensky. Photo: facebook.com/orbanviktor

There is debate and there is what Hungary is doing, writes G7

As G7 points out, there certainly are political debates among EU member states on the extension of the EPF envelope. France, for example, wanted to lobby for the subsidy to apply only to arms purchases from EU firms (this ultimately failed due to the capacity limits of European manufacturing). That said, the magazine highlights, the Hungarian policy towards aid to Ukraine is in a category of its own.

Viktor Orbán’s government has been complicating the work of the EU for several weeks now, and Brussels politicians seem to be getting fed up with the politicking. Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis, for example, has complained that Hungary is currently blocking 41 percent of draft legislation on Ukraine.

As DNH wrote here, POLITICO talked to three diplomats working in Brussels who suggested that the Hungarian government could lose a significant position within the EU due to its Ukraine policy. Furthermore, Euractiv wrote in an article at the end of May that several politicians are frustrated by Orbán’s government:

“[S]ome EU diplomats have said they see Hungary’s veto actions as a pattern of behaviour that might require a discussion about practical changes to the bloc’s decision-making processes.”

The reasons are not clear, but aid to Ukraine remains on hold

The purpose of the Hungarian government’s actions is not entirely clear even to member state representatives, but, as G7 writes, there are several potential explanations.

As for the government’s official position on the aid to Ukraine:

  • The Hungarian government had objected to the designation of OTP bank as a war-supporting company by Ukraine. Since then, the bank has been removed from the blacklist, but nonetheless, Hungary is pushing back on funds being released, now citing negative discrimination against Hungarian companies in Ukraine as a decisive factor for the obstruction.
  • Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó continuously reiterates the official Hungarian position that Brussels is “pro-war” and that the aid will only escalate the war in Ukraine, even leading to the conscription of Hungarian youth.

On the other hand, G7 mentions some other possible explanations for the Hungarian position:

  • According to some, the Hungarian government is seeking to unfreeze EU funds blocked by the European Commission over rule-of-law concerns in the country. “By stopping payments (of aid to Ukraine) at lower levels, the prime minister wants to raise the issue to the level of the EU summit and there open up the veto lift to a broader negotiation,” G7 writes.
  • The Orbán government may also be hoping to be in a better position to negotiate after the EP elections.
  • Furthermore, some say that the time wasted related to EPF payments is a pro-Russian move, as it helps weaken Ukrainian defences.

Read also:

Foreign minister: Government does not allow Hungary to be ‘sucked into NATO’s war madness’

ukraine

Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó said after an informal meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Prague on Friday that “some statements showing a total lack of sober judgment” had been made but the government will not allow Hungary “to be sucked into NATO’s war madness”.

The ministry cited Szijjártó telling a press conference that “the war express has pulled out of the penultimate station” and it is questionable if there was still a chance to stop it.

“I think there is only one emergency brake left that we can rely on, which is the June 9 EP election, in which ballot European people, among them Hungarian voters, can make it clear for their governments that they do not want to live in war in Europe in the long term,” he said.

Szijjártó said the atmosphere of the meeting had been “as if we were in the last phases of preparation for war”.

He said several “dangerous proposals” had been made, for instance, that the Ukrainian army could aim the US weapons at Russian targets, and Western experts would be dispatched to Ukraine to train soldiers.

“We believe that with all these proposals and ideas, NATO will make more, and increasingly large steps in the direction of getting involved in the war, whereas two and a half years ago we decided together that NATO must not be part of the war,” he said.

read also:

  • Anti-Hungarian Romanian President Iohannis as NATO Secretary General candidate supported by Orbán’s cabinet, details HERE
  • PM Orbán wants Hungary to be non-participant in the NATO: will Budapest be expelled?

Minister Szijjártó worries about the economic impact of the war in Europe, ignores Ukraine’s shattered economy

szijjártó ukraine eu Paks

Apart from the casualties and destruction, the war in Ukraine “is causing serious economic damage”, which underlines the importance of establishing peace as soon as possible, Péter Szijjártó, the foreign minister, said in Brussels on Thursday, adding that “unimpeded economic development” was conditional on peace.

Europe “is facing serious difficulties and its economy is quickly deteriorating,” foreign ministry statement quoted Szijjártó as saying at the council meeting with foreign trade on its agenda. “The situation has been deteriorating since the outbreak of the war.”

Szijjarto said the EU’s “ill-advised” measures had dealt a serious blow to the bloc’s competitiveness, adding that in wake of the EU sanctions against Russia “energy prices and inflation have skyrocketed”.

He said that unlike the US and China, the EU had failed to take measures to protect their own businesses. “What’s more, the EU has introduced further red tape hindering economic growth”.

While the US administration allocated 370 billion dollars to support strategic industries, “member states here need a permit from Brussels to provide a subsidy for investment projects from their own coffers,” he said, adding that the European Commission’s procedures “often take years to complete”.

The minister slammed the EU for applying “an ideological approach to economic issues, as a consequence of which the world is falling into blocs again, which also hinders economic growth.”

“Brussels and other Western European capitals are seeking to destroy absolutely sensible East-West cooperation,” he said, adding that this could potentially “knock out” the European economy.

It was “indispensable” to help the EU “become a winner rather than a loser in the global economy’s most significant revolutionary transition; that is, the transformation of car making,” he said.

Hungary is an excellent example of the benefits of cooperation between East and West, Szijjártó said, adding that cooperation with Eastern countries had brought the country “to the forefront of the global technological revolution, with tens of thousands of modern jobs.”

Hungary has “thus become the meeting point for Eastern and Western economies, thanks to a marked presence of German, Chinese, and South Korean companies,” he said. The Hungarian government “will not support any measures … that could hinder, prevent, or make more expensive cooperation between the EU and China,” he added.

The minister insisted that the European and Hungarian economies “could not grow as much without Chinese investments as with close cooperation.”

Meanwhile, the council voted to increase duty on Russian and Belarusian food imports, Szijjártó said, adding that Hungary was the only country that had abstained.

The foreign minister said all this “highlights the importance of peace”.

“Hungary has paid a high price for the war in the form of 10 billion euros of dearer energy bills,” he said, adding that the country had also spent most of last year fighting inflation.

The foreign minister insisted that the war and sanctions in response were to blame for rising inflation instead of the government’s “so-called mistaken economic strategy and bad decisions”.

read also:

Heated debates expected by Orbán cabinet at NATO foreign ministers’ informal meeting on Friday

ukraine nato

Heated debates can be expected at Friday’s meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Prague, Péter Szijjártó, the foreign minister, said in Brussels on Thursday. “We can expect war psychosis to peak and [participants] to support crazier ideas than ever,” he said.

Szijjártó said he did not expect “a friendly atmosphere”, and he warned of “a very dangerous situation”, the ministry quoted him as saying.

“Apparently, our European colleagues have plunged themselves with great vigour into the deepening pits of war psychosis on Monday, and I believe that the presence of the Americans and the British will even stimulate this hysterical state,” he said.

“And I expect the meeting of NATO foreign ministers to be surrounded by an even greater pro-war atmosphere than before…” he said.

Regarding a proposal to allow Ukrainian forces to use Western weapons to fire into Russian territory, he said the Russians far from lacked equipment and were bound to retaliate, leading to “many, many more casualties”.

Arms deliveries to Ukraine would increase the number of weapons on both sides of the front, causing more deaths.

“Even the NATO decision to cross the red line that we drew ourselves two years ago in February is very dangerous. NATO crossed this red line by increasing its own role in coordinating weapons deliveries and the training of Ukrainian soldiers,” he said.

He noted that preparations for NATO’s Ukraine mission had been progressing at full tilt in recent weeks, which was “extremely dangerous” and contrary to the alliance’s original mission, as the organisation was not under attack.

“There is no need to use war rhetoric or create war tension,” the minister said. “This is a defence alliance, not one designed to attack.”

He said the government had made it clear in recent weeks that “no Hungarian soldiers can take part in such operations, no Hungarian territories can be used for such operations and no Hungarian taxpayers funds can be used either.” Yet Hungary was being “put under pressure to join this”, he added.

“Naturally, I will continue to resist tomorrow, and make it clear that there is no way Hungary can be forced to join this operation. And it is still unclear how the mission can go ahead without Hungarian taxpayers’ money being used. So heated debates can be expected tomorrow,” Szijjarto said.

Defence minister: possibility of any intervention could only lead to a protraction of the war

Daily News Hungary Logo Új

Hungary does not support either the deployment of European troops to the war in Ukraine or European mandatory conscription, the defence minister said in Brussels on Tuesday.

In a statement sent to MTI after a meeting with his European Union counterparts, Kristóf Szalay-Bobrovniczky said that in the final stretch of the European parliamentary election campaign, certain member states were putting forward “risky proposals that could easily lead to an aggravation of the war”.

He said member states were increasingly coming forward with the “chilling idea” of sending soldiers from European member states to Ukraine. Certain politicians, he added, were already talking about mandatory conscription at the European level. He said this would primarily concern the youth of the member states closest to Ukraine, such as Hungarians, adding that this was unacceptable to Hungary.

Szalay-Bobrovniczky said the main topic of Tuesday’s meeting was the EU’s military support for Ukraine. He said the majority of member states wanted to even intensify the use of military equipment, and some were increasingly open about the possibility of even sending troops to Ukraine as part of the bloc’s training mission.

“The proposal that EU member states should shoot down Russian missiles above Ukraine is also shocking,” the minister said, warning that raising this possibility would lead straight to a direct confrontation between Russia and NATO member states.

He said such proposals failed to take into consideration that sending weapons and troops and the possibility of any intervention could only lead to a protraction of the war. Only a ceasefire and peace talks could end the conflict, he added. Hungary, he said, refused to compromise on its stance that this was the only way to bring an end to the fighting.

The defence minister said the Hungarian government refused to back any steps that would lead to an escalation or prolongation of the war, endanger the security of Hungarians or harm Hungarian interests.

read also:

  • Hungary welcomes first KC-390 military transport aircraft – PHOTOS, VIDEO
  • Hungarian Minister of Defence: Two more Airbus H225M helicopters added to Hungarian fleet, details HERE

Hungarian government says EU politicians want to take young people to the Ukrainian front

ukraine

“Crazy proposals” to introduce the draft in Europe “are unacceptable”, the foreign minister said on Monday, adding that “the Hungarian government will in no way allow central European youths, including Hungarians, to be sent to the war in Ukraine.”

At a press conference after a meeting of his European Union counterparts, Péter Szijjártó said “the countdown” to the European parliamentary elections “is unfortunately bringing about an increase in war sentiment”, with many proposing more money and arms for Ukraine, “which can only result in further destruction and more deaths”.

He referred to proposals aimed at allowing Ukraine to use Western arms against targets in Russia. “They talk positively about an initiative for NATO countries to shoot down Russian missiles above Ukraine and, unfortunately, my fellow foreign ministers have not distanced themselves from threats of nuclear war,” he said, adding that such remarks and “crazy proposals” could have “dangerous and tragic consequences”.

“We don’t want to see Hungarians at the frontline of the Ukraine-Russia war, and we do not want young Hungarians to be taken to Ukraine. This isn’t our war and we have nothing to do with it,” Szijjártó said.

“We firmly call on all European politicians mulling mandatory conscription to drop such ideas immediately… Hands off our central European and Hungarians young people,” Szijjártó said.

Regarding the draft of the 14th sanctions package against Russia, Szijjártó said that it was against Hungary’s economic interests in its current form and would also endanger the security of Hungary’s energy supply. The government was unwilling to vote for it, he added.

He said the measures would swipe a serious blow to Hungary’s agriculture and food industry, and could compromise “the way Hungary pays for” its electricity, slow down the Paks upgrade project and violate Hungary’ sovereignty concerning the issuance of certain export permits.

He insisted that the previous 13 sanctions packages had done “a lot more harm to Europe than to Russia”.

On another subject, Szijjártó said Hungary was sticking to its earlier position and would not agree to freeing up a further 6.5 billion euros from the European Peace Facility for arms deliveries to Ukraine.

He said the foreign ministers of Germany, Lithuania, Ireland, Poland and other countries had “ganged up on him” at the meeting but “this hasn’t shaken our position”. “No matter how loud Europe’s pro-war politicians shout … we won’t give in to pro-war pressure,” he said.

“We insist that peace must be achieved and the senseless killing of people stopped; any escalation of the war must be prevented,” he said.

read also:

  • PM Orbán wants Hungary to be non-participant in the NATO: will Budapest be expelled?
  • Orbán’s party: Joe Biden and his man in Budapest want to squeeze Hungary into the war – details HERE

According to PM Orbán, Brussels wants to enter the war

Orbán Putin visit Russian cyberattack eu border controls

Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said on Friday that preparations were under way in Brussels for Europe’s entry to war, and added that it was necessary to strengthen Hungary’s self-defence capabilities.

There are some alarming similarities between now and the era when preparations were being made for the first and second world wars, Orbán told public broadcaster Kossuth Radio.

“What’s happening today in Brussels and Washington, or currently more in Brussels than in Washington, is setting the mood for an eventual military conflict, which we might as well describe as preparing Europe’s entry to war,” he said.

At the same time, Orbán said there was a need for an army because that in itself would not result in war. Weakness is the most common reason for wars, so it is necessary to have an army and soldiers, to make preparations, and to strengthen self-defence capabilities, he said.

Orbán said Hungary lacked such capabilities for a long time and they are still not sufficient. The country’s army is not yet strong enough, but progress is being made to strengthen it, he added.

He said that in response to the question whether Russia would stop after defeating Ukraine, the answer is that the Russian army was fighting a serious and difficult war with Ukrainians and it was still unable to defeat them. NATO’s military capabilities are incomparably greater than Russia’s, Orbán said, adding that he did “not consider the assumption logical that Russia, which cannot even defeat Ukraine, would all of a sudden come and swallow the entire Western world”.

He said chances were very slim that anyone would dare to attack a NATO member country today.

NATO has made it clear that it is a defence alliance and will not tolerate any military action that would harm the sovereignty of any NATO member state, he added.

Orbán said he interpreted the references to a threat by Russia as preparatory maneuvers by Europeans or Westerners towards entering the war.

Instead of handling the conflict as a war between two Slavic nations and localising it, the western Europeans recognise the conflict as their own war, Orbán said. The shifting of the German position well demonstrated how “we are getting closer and closer to war every month”. Now they are already talking about plans that certain countries could destroy Russian military equipment in Ukrainian airspace or enter Ukrainian territory other than the frontline, he added.

“With an understanding of European history, this can be regarded as a communication maneuver for war activity,” he said.

Orbán said it was impossible to tell how long it would take for the European strategy to succeed, how many more weapons and money would have to be sent.

Sooner or later, it could result in a confrontation between NATO, the European Union and Russia, the last being a nuclear power, a situation that would give reason for “the darkest visions”, he said.

Hungary is currently in a very difficult situation because “we are the country that insists on NATO’s basic treaty and the consensus that determines its mission,” the prime minister said. NATO is a defence alliance which was set up to ensure that in case any member state is attacked, the others would step in to help,” he said. The idea had not been raised that NATO would carry out military operations beyond its territory and engage in war with countries that are outside the alliance, he said.

“At the same time, it’s as if everyone was in a different future and there are preparations under way in Brussels by working groups on how NATO could participate in the Russia-Ukraine war,” he said.

As regards Hungary’s situation in that context, Orbán said that Hungary, as a NATO member has representatives in those groups, “but we do not want to participate in the conflict, either by providing financial contribution or by sending weapons; not even within NATO’s framework”. He said he was not sure “how long that situation could be maintained,” adding that Hungary therefore needed “to redefine its position within the military alliance”.

“There is serious work underway to define how Hungary could exist as a NATO member without participating in NATO action outside the military alliance’s territory,” he said. Hungary’s diplomacy must resolve this question, Orbán said, adding that a “new description”, a “new definition” must be created.

Orbán said Hungarians believe that the upcoming EP election will be about war and peace. “And of course also about migration and the protection of traditional families, but the question of war now comes before all other important issues,” he added.

Orbán said that in the future this European election “could easily be regarded as the one in which the question of war and peace was decided”.

Beyond all the suffering, the war also generates profits for the military industry and arms dealers, he said.

People with insider information about the war, those involved in speculation and not in production, in other word venture capital speculators are among those supporting war, including US financier George Soros, he added.

“Some politicians can be bought, such as those on the Hungarian left, who are financed by the pro-war financiers,” he said. It was no surprise, Orbán added, that the Hungarian left was pro-war “despite the will of left wing voters”.

The prime minister said it was unclear to him why the leaders of big European countries had a pro-war stance.

The root cause of Europe’s most serious problems such as a demographic decline and migration is war, he said, adding that every war fought in Europe in the past 100-150 years “caused losses to everyone involved”.

He said “the last resort” in efforts “to compete against the pro-war circles of interest” were the people, the voters, “because Europe, after all, is a democracy”.

Orbán said he anticipated that an increasing number of people supporting peace would cast their ballots in next month’s EP elections, adding that “I would be satisfied if at least the people could stop the process of drifting into the war with their votes”. “But with that only half of the job would be done…., because the other half would have to be done later, in the United States,” he said, making reference to the presidential elections in November.

On another subject, Orbán said that the European Court had made “an outrageous decision” obliging Hungary to pay a daily fine worth around 6 million forints (EUR 15,000) to Brussels just because it refused to accept migrants.

Orbán told public radio that it was more than shocking and “absolute nonsense” that while Hungary was protecting Europe, spending several billion euros on border protection, it was “shot in the back from Brussels”.

“The only answer to that is that we must send away the European leaders who make such decisions,” Orbán said.

Read also:

FM Szijjártó: NATO had begun to “blur its own red lines”

New York Young Republicans Club Hungarian foreign minister Szijjártó

Péter Szijjártó, the foreign minister, has said he expects an “elemental struggle” in connection with a proposal by NATO regarding a mission in Ukraine in the coming weeks, underlining, however, that Hungary did not want to train Ukrainian soldiers or deliver weapons to its north-eastern neighbour despite the “enormous pressure” it was under to do so.

Szijjártó about NATO

 Addressing a meeting of ruling Fidesz’s parliamentary group on Monday, Szijjártó said NATO had begun to “blur its own red lines” that said the alliance was not party to the war in Ukraine and that everything possible had to be done to prevent a direct confrontation with Russia.

“And now … the secretary general felt that it would also be worthwhile for NATO to do something, because we can’t have NATO just sitting around for two years with only its member states and the European Union taking the steps that endanger global security,” Szijjártó said.

The minister said NATO wanted to step up its coordination of weapons deliveries and the training of Ukrainian troops, and was planning to approve a 100 billion euro aid package. “Hungary, however, doesn’t want to take part in this in any form,” he added.

“We want to stay out of this completely,” Szijjártó said. He said Hungary wanted its soldiers to be exempt from participating in such a mission and did not want “anything relating to these types of operations happening on Hungary’s territory”. Neither does Hungary want any of its taxpayers’ money to be used for the mission, he added.

Hungary, he said, was under intense pressure to take part in the mission, pointing out that the other two NATO countries that had been on the fence had been persuaded to join the common position, and Hungary was now on its own.

“Everyone has been sucked in, and we’re on our own. And we’ll be completely alone in the battles in the coming weeks,” he said.

Szijjártó said work was already underway in Brussels on putting together the “hinterland” of the operation. “And we’re being pushed in,” he insisted. “We’ve more or less succeeded in getting them to accept, politically, that we don’t want to participate in this, but as I see it, they want to at least try to push us into the financial side of the story.”

“Now they’re trying to put pressure on us by saying, ‘fine, no Hungarian soldiers or even [the use of ] Hungarian territory, but there has to be money’,” Szijjarto said. “And there we have the battle of the weeks ahead: no to all three.”

Meanwhile, Szijjarto said NATO did not want to set a precedent for a member state staying out of a military operation. He lamented that Western political leaders were showing no signs of backing out of weapons deliveries even though it had become clear that the conflict could not be settled on the battlefield.

“Everyone in Europe has been ordered to give everything they have … no matter how it may harm their own security,” the minister said.

The clear position “in NATO circles today”, he said, was that allies needed to help Ukraine even at the risk of hurting their own security. He cited the example of Slovakia, which had not been compensated on time for giving all of its military planes to Ukraine, and its airspace was now being policed by Hungary and Czechia.

“If we Hungarians and the Czechs didn’t guarantee the protection of Slovakia’s airspace, then their only air defence capability would be to angrily shake their fists up at the sky,” Szijjártó said.

He said that because weapons deliveries were “only enough to uphold the status quo”, the only way out was to involve NATO by sending troops and “causing a world war”.

Szijjártó said another scenario would involve the use of nuclear weapons, “of which even one is enough to settle the fate of the world, and there are thousands of them on both sides”.

szijjártó in switzerland
Photo: Facebook/Szijjártó Péter

Read also:

Surprising: Fidesz politician shares strongest criticism of Russia so far

Németh Zsolt Fidesz politician revolution of national cohesion

A Fidesz politician recently said something that can be considered unusual coming from the party. Zsolt Németh has previously made statements about Russia and NATO that differ from official government communications and Fidesz propaganda: however, he has never been so direct in his opposition to the Orbán direction when it comes to the conflict in our neighbourhood.

Németh Zsolt
Some strong statements have been made by the Fidesz politician about Russia and its war in Ukraine. Photo: Facebook/Németh Zsolt

Strong statements made by the Fidesz politician

“As far as the past 25 years are concerned, if we were not members of NATO now, it would probably not be Ukraine that would be defending itself against a Russian attack, but us”, Zsolt Németh began his speech at the conference of the Hungarian Atlantic Society (Magyar Atlanti Társaság) on Tuesday 7 May at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Magyar Tudományos Akadémia), Válasz Online reports.

The Fidesz politician has been outspoken before about this, but he has never been so clear to say that anyone who raises the question of NATO’s responsibility for the Russian invasion of Ukraine is not only spreading lies but is also acting against the Hungarian interest, for those who threaten Hungarian sovereignty are the Russians.

Németh: NATO is not an anti-Russian organisation

NATO Sweden Orbán Stoltenberg
Photo: FB/Orbán

“NATO, whatever President Putin’s esteemed propagandists may say, is not an anti-Russian organisation, it does not plan to attack Russia and never has, but it can protect its members from a Russian attack. Russia cannot limit Hungarian sovereignty by military means because we are a member of NATO,” Zsolt Németh said.

According to the politician, “the fact that Russia sees this defence alliance as a threat is simply proof that it wants to dominate NATO members – or at least part of NATO members – and that NATO is making this impossible. Russia’s behaviour says more about itself than it does about us,” the Fidesz politician added.

According to Németh, Hungary’s membership of NATO is of the greatest importance since we joined 25 years ago because of the war, and therefore we must take a firm stand against those efforts that seek to turn Hungarian public opinion against NATO.

The Russian-Ukrainian war did not break out because of NATO

hungarians fighting in ukraine war fegyir sándor
The leader of the Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Ukraine, László Zubánics (far right), visited Hungarians fighting in the eastern part of the country. Source: Facebook/Федір Шандор (Fegyir Sándor)

“Any deception of public opinion on NATO is now a direct threat to the physical security and sovereignty of our country,” he said. He added that it is part of Russia’s military strategy to use various actions to undermine confidence in NATO and the importance of NATO membership in Central European countries.

According to the Fidesz politician, “it is extremely damaging to repeat the idea that the Russian-Ukrainian war broke out because of NATO”.

Németh also said that there is no Hungarian interest in Russia being able to arbitrarily tell other countries whether or not they can exercise their rights under international law. “We must not set a precedent for Russia to tell anyone else, because then it will tell us,” he added.

Read also:

Hungarian government: Supporting Ukrainian minority in Hungary more important than ever before

Hungarian-Ukrainian youth conference Budapest Ukrainian minority

Supporting the Ukrainian minority in Hungary and the representation of their rights is more important than ever before, the foreign ministry’s state secretary for developing bilateral relations told a Hungarian-Ukrainian youth conference in Budapest on Saturday.

Supporting Ukrainian minority more important than ever

Hungarian-Ukrainian youth conference Budapest Ukrainian minority
Hungarian-Ukrainian youth conference in Budapest on 11 May 2024. Photo: Facebook/Illés Boglárka

Boglárka Illés called those two goals important, citing studies suggesting that the number of Ukrainian nationals settling and currently living in Hungary has increased to over 40,000 from a few thousand earlier.

The Hungarian government firmly condemns Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, she said.

Hungary has carried out the largest-ever humanitarian aid operation since the outbreak of the war in neighbouring Ukraine, she said. While Hungary recognises Ukraine’s right to defend itself, it provides help in every possible form to refugees fleeing the war, said Illés.

Since February 2022, more than one million people have crossed the border to Hungary from Ukraine, she said, adding that over 5,000 Ukrainian children are ensured education and safe supplies in some 1,500 schools in Hungary.

Hungary also provides support to more than half a million families in Ukraine in the form of developing and refurbishing schools and hospitals.

Support must be provided, Illés said, arguing that there should be a focus on the future “which is in the hands of our children and our youth”. She thanked Liliána Grexa, spokesperson of the ethnic Ukrainian minority in Hungary’s parliament, for initiating and organising the conference.

“The war must be brought to an end as soon as possible, and Ukraine must be rebuilt…., and young people including the participants of this current event will play a huge role in that,” Illés said.

Grexa said the idea of taking steps to improve Ukrainian-Hungarian relations had occurred to her last December and she saw an opportunity in organising a forum for young Ukrainians and Hungarians to meet, exchange their views and so start a dialogue.

Read also:

Hungarian government sends email to public concerning NATO plans on Ukraine war

The government has sent out an email concerning its standpoint on NATO plans in Ukraine to members of the public who had already provided their contact details.

There is no possibility of a settlement on the battlefield and a return to negotiations is therefore needed, the Government Information Centre (KTK) said on Friday in connection with reports of a NATO plan to set up a mission in Ukraine encompassing military training and the coordination of arms shipments.

The email said NATO wanted to “pump” 100 billion dollars into the war over a period of five years, “so it’s likely that the conflict will be prolonged by at least five years”.

“What we see is the worst-case scenario that could lead to a world war,” the statement said, adding that Hungary was under huge pressure to back plans broadening the war.

It said the government’s position was clear: “We want to stay out of the war. We do not want to take part in the NATO mission.”

The statement added that the government would do everything to ensure that Hungary “does not send weapons and soldiers”.

“Lives can be saved only with a ceasefire and through peace,” it added.

Read also: