“I hope he wins big”: Trump backs PM Orbán in video message at CPAC Hungary

At this year’s CPAC Hungary in Budapest, US President Donald Trump once again voiced firm support for Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán in a video message addressed to attendees.

Trump endorses Orbán ahead of elections

Trump described Orbán as a “strong leader” and confirmed his “full and unconditional support” for the Hungarian leader’s upcoming re-election bid. He praised Orbán’s policies on border protection and national sovereignty, arguing that Hungary had demonstrated how to defend cultural identity and state interests in a challenging geopolitical climate.

As Telex writes, the US president also expressed confidence in Orbán’s electoral prospects, saying he hoped for a decisive victory despite political attacks. According to Trump, conservative forces worldwide share a common goal: to win “fairly, decisively and with strength.”

Have you heard? Putin-linked figure set to oversee Hungary’s election monitoring.

A shared vision for the West

In his address, Trump emphasised what he described as a shared civilisational mission between the United States, Hungary and Europe. He thanked participants for their commitment to conservative values and “common sense,” adding that their cooperation could help shape a renewed Western world.

He also pointed to future collaboration on energy policy and migration, stressing that European countries must address mounting challenges and move towards solutions.

In case you missed it, Hungarian minister: we’d consider sending soldiers if Trump asked us to, Orbán: This is nonsense!

Messages from international leaders

Other prominent figures also contributed remotely to the conference. Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babiš was unable to attend in person due to a domestic emergency but sent a video message highlighting the importance of stability and security. He praised Hungary’s government for supporting families and protecting national interests.

Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also addressed the gathering via video. He thanked participants for backing Western civilisation and Israel, describing Orbán as “a rock” symbolising stability, security and protection.

Have you heard? Orbán cabinet: a classified national security report on Tisza may soon be released.

CPAC is a high-profile conservative gathering

This year’s CPAC Hungary is drawing global attention as a key meeting point for conservative leaders and thinkers. Although some expected attendees could not be present in person, the event continues to serve as a platform for reinforcing political alliances and shared ideological goals ahead of crucial elections in Hungary.

3 Comments

  1. How nice for “Man Of Peace” Donald Trump to take some time away from his war of aggression to advocate for “Man of Peace” Orban who supports the three aggressors involved in the biggest wars on our planet (Putin, Trump and Netanyahu). How is Orban for peace when he supports the biggest war mongers on our planet?

  2. Reuters reports President Donald Trump ends the third week of the Iran war confronting a crisis that seems to be slipping out of his hands: Global energy prices are surging, the United States stands isolated from allies and more ​troops are preparing to deploy despite his promise the war would be only a “short excursion.”

    A defensive Trump called other NATO countries “cowards” for refusing to help secure the Strait of Hormuz and insisted the campaign was ‌unfolding according to plan. But his declaration on Friday that the battle “was Militarily WON” clashed with the reality of a defiant Iran that is choking off Gulf oil and gas supplies while launching missile strikes across the region.

    Trump, who took office promising to keep the U.S. out of “stupid” military interventions, now appears to control neither the outcome nor the messaging of a conflict he helped to initiate. The lack of a clear exit strategy carries risks both for his presidential legacy and his party’s political prospects as Republicans scramble to defend narrow majorities in Congress in the November midterm elections.

    “Trump has built himself ​a box called the Iran war, and he can’t figure out how to get out of it,” said Aaron David Miller, a former Middle East negotiator for Republican and Democratic administrations. “That’s his biggest source of frustration.”

    A White House ​official challenged that characterization, with many of Iran’s top leaders eliminated in targeted killings, most of its navy sunk and its ballistic missile arsenal largely destroyed.

    The limits of Trump’s power — diplomatically, militarily and politically — were thrown into sharp relief over the past week. He was caught off-guard by the resistance of fellow NATO members and other foreign partners to deploying their navies ​to help secure the Strait of Hormuz, according to another White House official who, like other officials Reuters spoke to for this story, was granted anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

    With the president not wanting to appear isolated, some White House aides have advised ​Trump to quickly find an “off-ramp” and set limits on the military operation’s scope, said one person close to the discussions. But it was unclear whether that argument was enough to sway Trump.

    In the view of some analysts, allies’ unwillingness reflects not only their reluctance over entanglement in a war they were not consulted on, but a backlash against his belittling of traditional U.S. alliances since his return to office 14 months ago.

    Differences with Israel also have begun surfacing, with Trump insisting that he knew nothing in advance about the Israeli attack on Iran’s South Pars gas field, while Israeli ​officials said the strike had indeed been coordinated with the U.S.

    He could go all-in and intensify the U.S. offensive, possibly ​even seizing Iran’s oil hub on Kharg Island or deploying troops along Iran’s coast to hunt for missile launchers. But that would risk a long-term military commitment that the American public would mostly oppose.

    Or, with both sides rejecting negotiations for now, Trump could declare victory and ‌try to walk ⁠away, which could alienate Gulf allies who would be left with a wounded, hostile Iran – one that could still pursue a crude nuclear weapon and still exert control over shipping in the Gulf. Iran has denied it is seeking a nuclear weapon.

    Reuters reported on Friday that the U.S. military is deploying thousands of additional Marines and sailors to the Middle East, although no decision had been made to send troops into Iran itself.

    The war has also shown Trump’s once-iron grip over his MAGA movement is weakening, with prominent influencers speaking out against the conflict. While his base has mostly stood with him so far, analysts say that Trump’s control could weaken in the coming weeks if gas prices keep rising and U.S. troops are deployed.

    “As the economics play themselves out,” Republican ​strategist Dave Wilson said, “people will start to say: ‘Why am I ​paying high gas prices again? … Why is the Strait ⁠of Hormuz now determining whether or not I can take a vacation next month?'”

    Since the war’s start on February 28, there has been a growing realization within the administration that the conflict and its consequences should have been better mapped out in advance, according to two sources familiar with White House thinking, although the first White House official countered that the campaign was extensively planned ​and well-equipped for any potential action.

    Analysts say Trump’s biggest misjudgment was over how Iran would respond to a conflict that it considers existential.
    Tehran has retaliated with its remaining missiles and ​a fleet of armed drones to ⁠offset its foes’ military superiority, striking neighboring Gulf states and mostly shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, the conduit for one-fifth of the world’s oil.
    Whether or not Trump and his aides foresaw the dangers, they have been unable to counter them effectively.

    “They failed to think through the contingencies around ways in which a conflict with Iran could go sideways, where it might not go according to the plan as they laid out,” said former U.S. ambassador John Bass, who served in Afghanistan and Turkey.

    As the conflict has dragged on, there have ⁠been increasing signs ​of Trump’s frustration with his inability to control the narrative. In recent days, he has torn into the news media, advancing unfounded allegations of “treason” for reporting ​that he sees as undermining the war effort.

    “He’s finding it difficult to drive the news cycle, as he’s accustomed to, because he still can’t explain why he’s taken this country to war and what comes next,” said Brett Bruen, a former foreign policy adviser in the Obama administration who now heads the ​Situation Room strategic consultancy in Washington. “He seems to have lost his mojo on messaging.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *