Zelensky: We’re willing to give up NATO membership for security guarantees

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has indicated that Kyiv may be prepared to abandon its long-standing ambition to join NATO in exchange for concrete security guarantees from the United States, European partners, and other allied nations.
Peace talks in Berlin take centre stage
Speaking ahead of high-level talks in Berlin, Zelensky described the potential compromise as a shift from NATO membership to “security guarantees” provided by friendly nations, Portfolio reports. The move is seen as a significant pivot for Ukraine, which has previously regarded NATO accession as its primary safeguard against Russian aggression: a stance even enshrined in the country’s constitution.
According to 444.hu, the president said that even if they do not join NATO, they want a guarantee similar to NATO’s Article 5, which would allow for military intervention by allies in the event of another Russian attack.
US envoys advocate painful concessions
The decision comes amid efforts to advance peace negotiations in Berlin, where international mediators are pressing for practical solutions to the ongoing conflict. Notably, US representatives, including former President Donald Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and his son-in-law Jared Kushner, reportedly encouraged Ukraine to consider difficult concessions, potentially including ceding territory along the frontlines to Russia.
Territorial integrity remains non-negotiable
Despite the proposed shift, Ukrainian officials have made clear that Kyiv will not surrender any territories to Moscow. Analysts suggest that this compromise could, in effect, satisfy one of Russia’s key war objectives while still preserving Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Pragmatic approach in the ongoing conflict
Zelensky’s announcement is a notable recalibration in Ukraine’s strategic posture, which signals both a pragmatic approach to negotiations and a willingness to explore alternatives to formal NATO membership in pursuit of long-term security.






Wait! Wasn’t the Budapest Accords a “security guarantee? And hows that working out?