BREAKING NEWS: Game-Changing clause could halt Hungarian Government’s skyscraper plans for Grand Budapest investment!

An interesting turn of events has occurred regarding the planned major investment in the Rákosrendező area, known as Mini-Dubai or Grand Budapest. Following the publication of the contracts, it has emerged that Budapest Public Utilities, a company of the Municipality of Budapest, holds a right of first refusal on the site. This right allows the capital to reclaim the strategic site, which was previously purchased by the Eagle Hills Group of the United Arab Emirates.
According to Telex, Gergely Karácsony, the Mayor of Budapest, has clarified that the municipality intends to exercise this right. The immediate payment of the first instalment of HUF 12.7 billion (EUR 30.9 million) would initiate the process of buying back the land, which would be financed using money recovered from the solidarity contribution. The new owner would be required to settle the full purchase price by 2039, enabling the capital to make staggered payments and implement the plans over the long term.

Rákosrendező: A twist in the contract
Under the mayor’s plans, the area would be developed as a city park rather than the current Grand Budapest investor concept of a modern skyscraper district. This plan aligns more closely with Budapest’s environmental and liveability goals. Karácsony stated that the capital intends for the real estate development to be implemented through international tenders to ensure that it constitutes sustainable development in the city’s interest.
Karácsony has been highly critical of the sale of the site, describing it as “net treason”. He called for the Grand Budapest contracts to be made public in the interest of transparency, which led to the discovery of a clause favouring the capital. The mayor asserted that the land should serve the interests of Budapest, not the profit motives of a foreign developer.

Reclaiming the Rákosrendező area and transforming it into a park city could represent one of the capital’s largest green investments, in line with Budapest’s long-term sustainability and liveability objectives. This project would not only bolster the economic stability of the capital but also enhance the quality of life for its residents.
The court ruling and the Rákosrendező case highlight the serious impact of the conflict between the capital and the government on Budapest’s development. Abstract resources and political disagreements delay the implementation of investments, while the direct interests of the population are often overshadowed. However, the current situation provides hope that the capital will gain greater autonomy and room for manoeuvre in its future development.
A possible source of funding: The solidarity contribution
Budapest reached an important milestone when the court ruled that the solidarity contribution imposed by the state on the capital was illegal. The ruling will enable the capital to recover HUF 28.3 billion (EUR 68.8 million) previously retained by the State Treasury. Gergely Karácsony stressed that this money is vital for Budapest’s viability but could also support financing a major investment.
After a protracted legal battle, the capital has now achieved victory. The size and principle of the solidarity contribution were challenged because they imposed a significant burden on the city while also contravening the financial autonomy of local authorities enshrined in the Fundamental Law. The court’s ruling means that Budapest can now recover the amount deducted, which will not only allow the city to continue operations but also implement major projects.
The capital has faced a tight budgetary situation for years, exacerbated by government cutbacks and a series of crises. In recent years, the municipality has had to resort to current account loans on several occasions to maintain day-to-day operations such as public transport and public services. However, the recent court ruling could help alleviate this situation and provide the capital with the opportunity to pursue a more independent economic path
Read also: