Hungarian PM’s chief of staff: The decision of Poland’s top court ‘misinterpreted’
A recent, “clear” decision by the Polish constitutional court is “being misinterpreted in Europe”, the prime minister’s chief of staff said on Saturday, arguing that “the dispute is not over whether European Union law has precedence over national legislation but in which areas it has precedence”.
Gergely Gulyás said that “the case is not about precedence but scope”, adding that in some areas, such as competition law, common European legislation is “indispensable” and its stipulations should be enforced “even to the detriment of national rules”.
Poland’s top court has given an answer “to a bad practice of recent years” under which European institutions “seek to extend their scope of authority to areas in which member states “have never conferred any powers” to those institutions, he said.
Prime Minister Viktor Orbán signed a government resolution Saturday morning welcoming the judgement by Poland’s constitutional court regarding the relationship between national and European Union law and requesting that EU institutions respect the sovereignty of member states, the PM’s press chief, Bertalan Havasi, told MTI.
LIBE delegation head: Reservations from 2018 against Hungary still persist
The resolution states that “the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Poland was prompted by bad practice of the European Union institutions, which disregards the principle of subsidiarity and seeks to deprive the rights of the Member States, rights never conferred to the European Union, by stealthy extension of powers without amending the Treaties of the European Union”.
“The primacy of EU law can take precedence only in areas where the European Union has competence, the framework of which is laid down in the Treaties of the European Union,” it states.
The resolution also says “the institutions of the European Union have a duty to respect the national identities of the Member States, which form an integral part of their fundamental political and constitutional order”.
“In addition to the European Union institutions, the law enforcement bodies of the Member States, in particular the constitutional courts and tribunals, are entitled to examine the scope and limits of the European Union’s competences,” it adds.
The government calls on EU institutions “to respect the limits of the sovereignty of the Member States in their operations” in the resolution.
Read alsoHungarian justice min: EU institutions must respect national identities
Source: MTI
Hungary and Poland must stand together.
There is no misrepresentation. The current Polish constitution dates from 1997. Poland signed up to the EU in 2004 and new what the 6 core values as enshrined in the EU were and they have not changed. The recent changes to the Polish legal system instituted by the ruling PiS , namely the way judges are appointed and then overseen by a government appointed Star Chamber completely goes against the independence of the Judiciary which is within the EU core value known as The Rule of Law. In effect, the Polish government are dictating what they want the outcome of a hearing to be – if a judge does not oblige, her or she is sacked and barred from working in the legal profession in Poland. That is what this issue is about and no one is ‘misunderstanding’ what is going on.