From Tirana to Budapest, monuments preserve the memory of two fifteenth-century leaders whose campaigns formed part of the wider effort to defend the political frontiers of late medieval Europe during the period of Ottoman expansion.
Author: Dorian Koçi, PhD
Walking through the centre of Tirana, among the rhythm of modern urban life, one may unexpectedly encounter a reminder of a distant European battlefield. A memorial* (see below) dedicated to János Hunyadi (John Hunyadi), erected in 2016 by the Embassy of Hungary in Tirana together with the Municipality of Tirana as a symbol of Albanian–Hungarian friendship, stands as a reminder of a remarkable chapter of shared European history. For many visitors and residents, the monument represents a Hungarian hero far from his homeland. Yet its presence in Albania carries a deeper meaning. It recalls a period during which the Kingdom of Hungary and the Albanian principalities confronted a common geopolitical challenge posed by the expansion of the Ottoman Empire.
The story becomes even more fascinating when one travels from Tirana to Budapest. In the Hungarian capital, in Millennium Park (Millenáris Park), located in Budapest’s 2nd District on the Buda side near Lövőház Street, stands a bust of Gjergj Kastrioti Skanderbeg, the Albanian national hero and one of Europe’s most renowned anti-Ottoman commanders. The monument, inaugurated as a symbol of Albanian–Hungarian friendship, represents a historical connection that reaches back almost six centuries. Standing today in one of Budapest’s modern urban parks, the bust of Skanderbeg recalls an era when Hungary and Albania were not separated by borders or national narratives but connected by a shared strategic reality.
Both stood on the frontiers of Europe, facing an empire whose expansion was reshaping the political map of the continent. These two monuments—one in Tirana commemorating Hunyadi and one in Budapest honouring Skanderbeg—tell a story that goes beyond national memory. They remind us that European history has often been shaped not only by individual kingdoms and peoples acting alone, but also by alliances forged in moments of crisis.
A forgotten chapter of European cooperation
The histories of Hungary and Albania are often told as separate national narratives, shaped by distinct historical experiences, cultural traditions, and political developments. Yet beneath these parallel histories lies a remarkable chapter of shared European heritage that deserves greater recognition.
During the fifteenth century—a period that fundamentally transformed Europe—Hungarians and Albanians found themselves defending the same strategic frontier against the expansion of the Ottoman Empire. Though separated by the Balkans and the Carpathian Basin, both societies confronted a common geopolitical and military challenge that demanded extraordinary leadership, military innovation, and political resilience. At the heart of this story stand two of Europe’s most celebrated military leaders: John Hunyadi (János Hunyadi), Regent of Hungary and defender of the Danube frontier, and Gjergj Kastrioti Skanderbeg, the Albanian nobleman who transformed a regional uprising into one of the longest and most successful resistance movements against Ottoman rule.
While both became national heroes in their respective countries, their historical significance extends far beyond Hungary and Albania. Together, they became two of the principal military leaders participating in the broader European effort to resist Ottoman expansion during the fifteenth century. The fifteenth century was a decisive turning point. Following Ottoman victories in the Balkans and the gradual weakening of Serbian and Byzantine power, the Kingdom of Hungary emerged as the principal military barrier protecting Central Europe. The Danube became one of the continent’s most important defensive lines. At the same time, Albanian territories became the western bastion of resistance in the Balkans. Positioned between the Adriatic coast and the interior routes of the peninsula, Albania occupied a strategically significant place in the geopolitical struggles of the age.
The survival of Hungary and Albania was therefore closely interconnected. A breakthrough on one front could have serious consequences for the other. In this geopolitical environment, cooperation between Hunyadi and Skanderbeg was not simply an idealistic vision—it was a strategic necessity. Although medieval diplomacy rarely produced the extensive documentation familiar to modern historians, surviving chronicles, diplomatic correspondence, and contemporary accounts reveal that both leaders shared an understanding of the wider challenge they faced.
Their attempts to coordinate military campaigns, exchange diplomatic missions, and participate in broader anti-Ottoman coalitions demonstrate that resistance to Ottoman expansion was never merely a national undertaking. It was part of a wider European struggle in which political alliances frequently crossed linguistic, cultural, and regional boundaries.
Hunyadi and Skanderbeg: two defenders of Europe
Today, Hunyadi is remembered as one of Hungary’s greatest military commanders. His most celebrated victory came at Belgrade in 1456, when his forces successfully defended the fortress against the army of Sultan Mehmed II, the conqueror of Constantinople. The victory at Belgrade had consequences far beyond Hungary. It halted Ottoman expansion towards Central Europe and became one of the most significant military achievements of fifteenth-century Europe. The ringing of church bells traditionally associated with the victory continues in many parts of Europe as a historical reminder of that moment.
Skanderbeg occupies an equally prominent position in Albanian historical memory. After returning to Krujë in 1443, he organized a long-lasting resistance movement that maintained a remarkable degree of autonomy in Albania for more than two decades against one of the most powerful empires of the era. His leadership transformed him from a regional nobleman into an international symbol of resistance. Contemporary European powers—from the Papacy, Venice to the Kingdom of Naples—recognized the importance of the Albanian struggle within the broader confrontation with the Ottoman Empire.
Yet the relationship between Hunyadi and Skanderbeg deserves to be remembered not merely as the encounter of two extraordinary individuals. It represents one of the earliest examples of strategic cooperation among European actors facing a common geopolitical challenge. Their shared struggle reminds us that the defense of Europe was never the achievement of a single nation. It was the result of alliances, diplomacy, and sacrifices made across political and cultural frontiers.
The Crusade of Varna and the alliance that almost happened
One of the most intriguing episodes in the relationship between Hunyadi and Skanderbeg concerns the Crusade of Varna in 1444, an ambitious European attempt to halt Ottoman expansion in the Balkans. Following Skanderbeg’s return to Krujë in 1443 and the beginning of the Albanian uprising, a new possibility emerged for coordinated resistance. In Hungary, John Hunyadi had already established himself as the leading military figure capable of challenging Ottoman power. Under the leadership of King Vladislaus III of Hungary and Poland, a major campaign was organized with the participation of Hungarian, Polish, Wallachian, and other European forces. Historical sources indicate that Skanderbeg intended to join this anti-Ottoman coalition.
The possibility of a united Hungarian-Albanian military effort represented one of the most promising moments for a coordinated European response. However, medieval Balkan politics proved to be as complicated as the military challenge itself. According to several contemporary and later historical sources, including the Byzantine historian Laonikos Chalkokondyles, the policies of Despot Đurađ Branković prevented Skanderbeg’s forces from crossing Serbian territory in time to join Hunyadi’s campaign. The defeat of the Christian coalition at the Battle of Varna on 10 November 1444, where King Vladislaus III was killed, became one of the most tragic episodes of fifteenth-century European history.
It demonstrated the difficulties of creating a unified front against Ottoman expansion, despite the shared interests of many European powers. Yet Varna also revealed something important: both Hunyadi and Skanderbeg understood that the Ottoman challenge could not be confronted by isolated resistance movements. Their strategic thinking belonged to a wider European vision in which cooperation among different peoples was essential.
Battle of Kosovo in 1448: one of the most significant unrealized opportunities for coordinated anti-Ottoman action during the fifteenth century.
The possibility of cooperation became even more concrete during Hunyadi’s campaign in Kosovo in 1448. By this time, diplomatic contacts between the Hungarian and Albanian leaders had become more visible. The Byzantine historian Laonikos Chalkokondyles records that Hunyadi sent envoys to Skanderbeg and the Albanian nobleman George Arianiti, seeking support for a coordinated offensive against the Ottomans. Skanderbeg’s intention to join Hunyadi’s campaign is also reflected in the political agreements of the period. His struggle, however, was complicated by several factors, including his conflict with Venice and the complex balance of power between regional actors.
The peace agreement reached between Skanderbeg and Venice included provisions indicating his intention to march with as many troops as possible to support Hunyadi. Nevertheless, political obstacles, logistical difficulties, and the continuing influence of regional rivalries prevented the Albanian forces from reaching Kosovo before the decisive battle had already taken place. The Second Battle of Kosovo in October 1448 ended with another defeat for Hunyadi’s forces against Sultan Murad II. For many historians, the episode represents one of the great missed opportunities for a coordinated European defense in the Balkans.
However, the episode illustrates the complexity of fifteenth-century diplomacy, where shared strategic interests frequently coexisted with regional rivalries and competing political priorities. The cooperation between Hunyadi and Skanderbeg was therefore not a simple military alliance in the modern sense. Rather, it was an example of two leaders who recognized a common strategic reality and repeatedly attempted to overcome political obstacles in pursuit of a wider goal.
A remarkable gesture of solidarity
Beyond military campaigns and diplomacy, historical traditions also preserve examples of solidarity between Hungarians and Albanians during this period. One of the most fascinating accounts concerns Skanderbeg’s reaction after the defeat at Varna. According to the Polish chronicler Marcin Bielski, Skanderbeg mourned the death of King Vladislaus III so deeply that he neither ate nor drank for three days. The same tradition suggests that survivors of the defeated Hungarian-Polish army found refuge in Albania, where Skanderbeg provided assistance, including shelter, food, medical care, and protection regardless of their origin.
Modern historians rightly approach this account with caution, as independent documentary confirmation is limited. Nevertheless, the story reflects the image of Skanderbeg as a leader who viewed the struggle against Ottoman expansion as a broader European cause rather than simply an Albanian national conflict. The symbolism of this tradition remains powerful. It represents an understanding that the defense of Europe was based not only on battlefield victories but also on shared responsibility and mutual assistance among peoples facing a common challenge.
Naples: the forgotten bridge between Hungary and Albania
An often-overlooked dimension of Hungarian-Albanian relations in the fifteenth century was the role of the Kingdom of Naples. Under Alfonso V of Aragon, Naples pursued an active anti-Ottoman policy in the Mediterranean and became one of Skanderbeg’s most important allies. The Treaty of Gaeta in 1451 formally strengthened the relationship between Skanderbeg and the Neapolitan crown, providing political and military support for the Albanian resistance. Naples also represented an important diplomatic bridge connecting Albanian interests with the broader European coalition against Ottoman expansion.
Through Naples, Albania became linked to a wider network that included the Papacy, Italian states, and Central European powers. This wider perspective is essential for understanding Skanderbeg’s role. Albania was an active participant in the diplomatic and military networks of fifteenth-century Europe. The same applies to Hungary. Hunyadi’s campaigns were not merely defensive operations for the Kingdom of Hungary; they were part of a larger effort to protect the political and cultural balance of Christian Europe.
If you missed it: New research identifies Hungary’s “blind king” and uncovers the Árpád dynasty’s ancient ties to formidable European conquerors
A shared European legacy
For centuries, Hungarian and Albanian historiography naturally emphasized their own national heroes. Hunyadi became one of the central figures of Hungarian historical memory, while Skanderbeg became the defining symbol of Albanian identity and resistance. Yet placing both figures within a broader European context reveals an even more significant historical reality. They were not simply two national heroes defending their own territories. They were leaders responding to a continental challenge. Their actions demonstrate that European history has often been shaped by cooperation among peoples who, despite differences in language and political organization, shared common interests and values.
The story of Hunyadi and Skanderbeg offers an important reminder today: European history has often been shaped through cooperation among peoples who, despite differences in language, political organization and culture, recognized common strategic interests. Their attempts to coordinate military action represent an early form of international strategic cooperation long before the emergence of modern alliances and international organizations. Nearly six centuries after Hunyadi and Skanderbeg sought to coordinate their efforts, the memory of their cooperation continues to inspire relations between Hungary and Albania.
The commemorative monuments in Tirana and Budapest do not celebrate military victories alone; they honour a shared historical experience that reminds us how dialogue, cooperation and mutual respect have long formed part of the European historical tradition. In this sense, the legacy of Hunyadi and Skanderbeg belongs not only to the history of Hungary and Albania, but also to the broader story of Europe itself. At a time when Europe continues to reflect on its common heritage, the story of Hunyadi and Skanderbeg offers a valuable lesson: The history of Europe’s defense has repeatedly depended upon cooperation among different peoples, rulers and political communities confronting common challenges.
It has always depended upon cooperation, solidarity, and the ability to recognize common challenges. The alliance that almost took shape between Hungary and Albania in the fifteenth century remains an extraordinary chapter of European history. It reminds us that the bonds between nations are not created only by treaties signed in modern times, but also by shared sacrifices and common struggles remembered across generations. The legacy of János Hunyadi and Gjergj Kastrioti Skanderbeg therefore belongs not only to Hungary and Albania, but to the wider European story—a story of resilience, cooperation, and the enduring search for unity in the face of adversity.
Have you read this? Hungarian explorer celebrated in Malaysia with memorial and landmark new book
