Egyutt: Orban linking migration with terrorism ‘disgraceful’
Budapest, November 16 (MTI) – It is “unacceptable and disgraceful” that Prime Minister Viktor Orban should make a connection in any way between the challenges of immigration and the Paris attacks, the opposition Egyutt party said on Monday.
Viktor Szigetvari, the party’s leader, said the prime minister had a chance to correct his previous anti-immigrant policies in order to support and not to sabotage joint European solutions. Szigetvari said the two lawmakers for Egyutt who sit as independents will vote against the proposal to oppose the EU quota system.
A stronger Europe is only possible if, in addition to mandatory quotas, a new policy on deportations and new Dublin rules are adopted, Szigetvari said, adding that meanwhile asylum-seekers should be treated as humans.
Egyutt calls on the government to withdraw the refugee laws enacted in September as they “contravene international laws in every way”. Szigetvari also said fence-building was the wrong way to go, while the party continues to support the fight against terrorism and the IS.
Source: http://mtva.hu/hu/hungary-matters
please make a donation here
Hot news
Winter is here: temperature in Hungary may drop below -10 degrees this weekend – PHOTOS
Hungary’s EU presidency will lead Romania, Bulgaria into the Schengen Zone – Orbán supports both states
Top Hungary news: snow covered Hungary, regime change in Budapest parking, forint free fall – 22 November, 2024
THE ranking: Győr’s Széchenyi István University among the top science universities
Hungarian minister proud that both German and Chinese battery plants are built in Hungary
Here are the top Hungarian cities for expats seeking a new home
2 Comments
Simple – have a referendum. Let the people decide.
Pleasing to know that the Hungarian opposition opposes IS….the rest is posturing…the only solution is selective resettlement as practised by UK and Australia. Merkel’s moral imperialism and Brussels incapacity should be condemned. What kind of refugee policy encourages people to take children on dangerous journeys enabled by criminals?