Child protection referendum: supreme court on side of pro-LGBTQ groups! – UPDATED

The Kúria, Hungary’s supreme court, on Friday threw out a recent decision by the National Election Committee (NVB) under which the NVB imposed a fine on civil organisations for encouraging voters to give answers in an April 3 referendum that would render the plebiscite invalid.

According to the Kúria, the organisations condemned by the NVB had excercised their right to free expression in their campaign. The NVB had earlier accused the civil groups of “abusing the law” by telling people that they should cast invalid votes in the referendum, held at the same time as the general election, on the subject of child protection regulations.

The organisations including Amnesty International Hungary, the Rainbow Mission, gay and lesbian rights groups Háttér and Labrisz, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee, gay sports association Atlasz, the Ökotárs foundation, and the Society for Freedom Rights

received a fine of 176,400 forints (EUR 470) each,

while Amnesty and Háttér were also fined 3 million forints each on the same charges but under decisions passed in different procedures.

On Wednesday, the Kúria threw out Háttér’s appeal against the fines, saying that Hatter had “failed to present its arguments to prove that NVB’s decision was in violation of the law”. In its Friday decision, however, the Kúria approved appeals by all 15 organisations and threw out the complaints against them.

The Kúria said participating in referendums was a fundamental right rather than an obligation, and voters had the right to cast invalid ballots if they so chose.

“Casting an invalid vote is not an infrigement; rather, it is an expression of the voter’s decision to abstain from answering the questions posed,”

the Kúria said. It added that civil groups’ expressing their opinion or influencing voters in the campaign could “not curb the substance of a referendum or the electoral autonomy of voters”.

Though calling on voters to cast invalid voters “could go against the constitutional purpose of a referendum”, freedom of expression, especially concerning public affairs, “must enjoy special protection” and should not be curbed “unless for a reason concerning the rule of law”, the Kúria said.

“No legal stipulations contain a prohibition of campaign messages aimed at invalid voting,”

it added. The Kúria’s decision is final and binding.

UPDATE – 20.02 GMT

Commenting on today’s decision, the NGOs said in a statement that the ruling was a victory for the 1.7 million people who spoiled their ballot papers in the referendum. Concerning three out of five of the cases, certain Kúria councils ruled against the election committee’s decisions and the related fines totalling 9 million forints in respect of rendering the referendum papers invalid, the statement said. In these cases,

the Kúria also found the campaign by the NGOs legitimate and legal,

it added.

But in two of the cases, another Kúria council rejected the appeal by Hatter and Amnesty International Hungary without properly examining the case, and upheld the election committee’s fine of 3 million forints against Háttér, so both NGOs have decided to turn to the Constitutional Court in the matter, the statement said. The statement added that the NGOs involved would show solidarity to each other and pay the fine jointly, while carrying on with their appeal to overturn it.

LGBTQ
Read alsoChild protection referendum: civil groups campaigning for invalid votes must pay a fine!

Source: MTI

4 Comments

  1. The referendum did not reach the required number of respondents (50%) by a big margin. That referendum is effectively a dead duck with no legal validity regarding the law, by law.

  2. Makes sense, in Canada you are allowed to scratch your ballot/make it invalid. Don’t see why the Hungarian government thought voters shouldn’t be able to do it too.

    After all, making a ballot invalid is also expressing democratic will.

  3. Canadas a great example – you did agree with the government they will track your phone and freeze you bank account that includes all electronic transactions – thousands of peaceful protester across the country be damed – this in a country larger than all of Europe.

  4. @TM, did I say that everything the Canadian government does or do is great? Hopefully, you answered no as I would like if you don’t put words in my mouth. In fact, the comment I made has nothing to do with the Canadian government, but a comment about the electoral system in Canada (even though I dislike the FPTP system that we also have in Canada, regardless of which government won).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *