CNN interview with the Hungarian foreign minister: referendum, migration and other interesting topics
New York, September 23 (MTI) – Violating borders between peaceful countries and picking a country to live in are not basic human rights, Hungary’s foreign minister said in an interview to CNN on Friday.
As a country adhering to international law, Hungary respects the right to a safe life as a fundamental human right, Péter Szijjártó said, rejecting the suggestion that Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán was whipping up an anti-migrant fervour in Hungary.
“There are rules and regulations how you can cross borders… And if there are people who, by will, do not respect our laws and regulations, violate our borders, we will not accept them,” Szijjártó said.
On the subject of Hungary’s border fence, he said Hungary was not the only country to have installed a barrier on its border, noting that Bulgaria had also built a fence and that Britain was in the process of building a wall to replace its fence in the northern French port of Calais.
Szijjártó argued that the reason why his country had received criticism for its handling of the migrant crisis was “because we comply with all the regulations and rules… which are valid in the European Union.”
He said the most important question regarding the future of Europe was whether member states would let the European Commission push them to give up part of their sovereignty and regulate whom they have to take in. “And it is only the Hungarian people who can make a decision about that regarding Hungary.”
Szijjártó said he understood that “everybody is very angry” in Europe. “Because there’s a growing gap between the European people and the European political elite.”
Responding to the argument that Hungary is having a referendum about migrant quotas but not on the upgrade of its nuclear power plant in Paks, Szijjártó argued that no European countries had held referendums about their nuclear plants.
Asked what the government would do if it lost the Oct. 2 migrant quota referendum, Szijjártó said: “We’re not going to lose.” He stressed, however, that win or lose, the government will respect the result of the referendum.
He insisted that Hungary as a sovereign country has the right to say whether or not it agrees with certain policies. “And we definitely totally disagree with the current European migrant policy, because it’s bad. It’s harmful for Europe, very harmful for Europe.”
Hungary rejects the quota system because it is “unimplementable”, goes against “common sense” and “violates the current European regulations”, Szijjártó said.
Source: MTI
please make a donation here
Hot news
Have your say! Hungary’s new National Consultation on wages, business, and housing
Stunning Hungarian myth and innovation murals unveiled in Türkiye for cultural season
No stopping: Hungarian forint hits another record low after weak GDP report
The Hungarian State Opera presents a staged production of Verdi’s Requiem
Staggering costs revealed: How Viktor Orbán’s frequent travelling with military planes is draining Hungarian taxpayers by millions
Hungarian justice minister: Strengthening Western Balkans cooperation crucial for Europe’s security
2 Comments
The thing they don’t say is that most of migrants don’t come from a war country as Syria or Irak. Most of them come from countries as Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, wich are in peace, so there’s no urge to welcome them.
Well said Foreign Minister ! ! http://dailynewshungary.com/cnn-interview-hungarian-foreign-minister-referendum-migration-interesting-topics/
Which ever way you look at his statement here, it is logical and realistic basic commonsense ! illegal immigrants show a disdain and no respect for the countries they invade. As with any house there is a front door so likewise it is for a country !! The despotic disharmony existing in so many countries of origin of these illegals is to be regretted, but invading another country is certainly not the way to go about it. Financial assistance to adjacent countries nearest to house and assist migrants for when a possible to return to their country of departure or seek a safer environment in an orderly and lawful manner !
The majority are in the main ‘economic migrants’ chancing their luck to improve their status only.
John H. Morton