In response to a question, Gergely Gulyás, the prime minister’s chief of staff, said on a press conference that holding a referendum on Hungary’s child protection law was “the most democratic solution possible”, arguing that it gave Hungarians a chance to decide on the law’s most important provisions.
He warned against “giving too much importance to” Wednesday’s ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union which said the regulation accepted by the European Parliament and Council on making EU funding conditional on adhering to principles of the rule of law was built on a sound legal footing. Gulyás added that
the ruling would only hurt Hungary if the opposition won the April 3 general election.
Gulyás said he did not expect the EU to sanction Hungary if ruling Fidesz won the election, adding, however, that he believed sanctions could be expected if a new government attempted to amend the constitution with a simple parliamentary majority.
He said that in spite of the disputes with Brussels, Hungary “broke records” over the last 12 years, becoming one of the most effective countries when it came to the drawdown of EU funds both within the Visegrád Group and the bloc as a whole. On another subject, he said the child protection law was the only reason why Brussels had yet to approve Hungary’s post-pandemic recovery plan.
Asked how much the legal fees in the rule-of-law conditionality lawsuit would cost Hungary if it were forced to pay them, Gulyás said he could not provide an exact figure, but
the cost would be “a negligible amount”.
He said the CJEU’s ruling made it clear that the application of the conditionality mechanism was only lawful if the violation of the principle of the rule of law directly impacted the bloc’ financial interests. “And Hungary has been one of the best performing countries in the European Union in this regard, and it has been scrutinised with a magnifying glass for years,” he said.
Hungary will never object to demands for judicial independence by the EU, because that is a part of the rule of law, Gulyás said. “But the question of whether two men should be allowed to get married does not fall under the rule of law, and every member states is free to decide on such an issue,” he argued. “We don’t allow that in Hungary and if someone wants to change that, they have to be Hungarian, they must win the necessary political support for it in Hungary and change the constitution if they have the majority required for it,” he said.
In response to another question, Gulyás said
Hungary would not exercise its veto on other issues because of the CJEU’s rejection of its legal challenge, adding that “we believe in loyal cooperation, so we evaluate every issue on its own merit.”
Gulyás said he was not concerned about the EU potential depriving Hungary of funding as a result of the CJEU’s ruling. Such a scenario, he said, could only unfold if Hungary was governed by political players who did not respect the principle of the rule of law, “but this only applies to the left-wing coalition in Hungary today”.
Source: MTI
please make a donation here
Hot news
Confirmed: Major Hungarian bank announces significant fee increases
Hungarian MOL strengthens ties with KazMunayGas to boost Kazakh oil and gas cooperation
Snowstorm alert: Half of Hungary braces for snow and strong winds
Ex-US Ambassador: Trump could broker respect between Putin and Zelensky, praises Orbán’s efforts for peace
Hungary ranks 1st globally for highest cancer death rates, new study finds
Breaking: A groundbreaking step in Hungary’s wage negotiations for 2025
5 Comments
It is time to reevaluate membership in the EU. The court’s decision is inline with leftist EU’s desire of total dictatorship. It is time for Hungarians to give total support to FIDESZ in order for Hungary to retain its sovereignty.
No previous foreign dictatorship, Hapsburg, Ottoman, Russian, was beneficial to the people.
If Hungary insists that the law is to protect children from the LGBTQ lobby? Then why in the heck would they care about two consenting adults getting married?
In fact, I would argue two guys getting married is better than having being caught at gay orgy (*cough* Jozef Szajer *cough*). At least, getting married is considered a normal thing to do.
@mariavontheresa
Don’t tell us who we should support.
Realist -that’s how it started – they only wanted marriage- now they demand acknowledgement of over 80 sexual orientations – eliminate mother and father – teach 1st graders transition to another sex is their choice and no parent consent needed. Tell the EU if they limit they limit the number of sexual orientation to under 10 we can talk. The new world order will demand the elimination of the religious bond of marriage.
@TM if you think every gay person or person from the LGBT community wants 1st graders to transition then I have to say that you are a bit delusional. You do realize many of them are regular folks and not sexual deviants like you think they are (ironic considering you are probably a fan of Fidesz whose minister got caught at gay orgy)?
It is super easy to take the vocal minority and create a stereotype/image on the whole community. One could take some vocal minorities/ actions by some individuals in Hungary and paint the whole country as a xenophobic, judgemental, and corrupt country. Now that wouldn’t be fair, would it?