In a ruling on Wednesday, the Court of Justice of the European Union said the regulation accepted by the European Parliament and Council on making EU funding conditional on adhering to principles of the rule of law was built on a sound legal footing, rejecting actions brought against the regulation by Hungary and Poland.
The decree is “compatible with the procedure laid down in Article 7 TEU and respects in particular the limits of the powers conferred on the European Union and the principle of legal certainty,” according to the decision based on an expedited procedure.
Poland and Hungary turned to the CJEU last March, saying the “conditionality clause” lacked sufficient legal basis, overstepped the limits of the EU’s competency, aimed at circumventing the Article 7 procedure and was in violation of the principle of legal certainty.
Justice Minister Judit Varga called today’s decision “politically motivated”, while Hungary’s ruling Fidesz party reacted by saying Hungary was being “stigmatised” over its child protection law.
In its reasoning, the CJEU noted that the procedure laid down in the resolution can be launched only when the breaches in question “affect or seriously risk affecting the sound financial management of the Union budget or the protection of the financial interests of the Union”.
The regulation aims to protect the EU’s budget from harm incurred by breaches to the principle, and not at the protection of the principle itself, the CJEU said.
“Compliance by the Member States with the common values on which the European Union … such as the rule of law and solidarity, justifies the mutual trust between those States. Since that compliance is a condition for the enjoyment of all the rights deriving from the application of the Treaties to a Member State, the European Union must be able to defend those values,” according to the ruling.
Varga said in a Facebook post today that the decision “proves that Brussels is abusing its power … it is another way of putting pressure on Hungary for the amendments to its child protection law accepted last summer”, which the EU has called discriminative against the LGBTQ community.
Referring to a referendum on the child protection law on April 3, Varga said
“Brussels cannot accept that Hungarians can have their say at a referendum. The bureaucratic elite refuses to accept Hungarians’ free decision and opinion,”
she said.
Hungary’s ruling Fidesz party reacted by saying Hungary was being “stigmatised” over its child protection law. It slammed the ruling as “the latest stage of a months-long campaign of political revenge” which had been “prepared in advance”.
“Brussels does not want to accept Hungary’s refusal to give in to pressure, that it passed a law to stop the LGBTQ propaganda targeting children and even called a referendum on the issue,” the party said in a statement. “That is why Hungary was sued, why this whole rule-of-law jihad was launched and that is why they want to stigmatise, comdemn and punish our country.”
Source: MTI
9 Comments
With regard to Hungary, the real meat is the wholesale corruption and misuse of EU funds at the highest level in government. The LGBTQ issue is a red herring.
If Brussels wants to with hold EU funding then Hungary should refuse to make its contributions to Brussels. Really things only get worse for us Hungarians as a member of the EU. Time for a Hungarian withdrawal from a growing tyrannical EU that places moral deneracy over morality and family values.
Hungary contributes nothing to Brussels money wise. It has never made a net contribution since joining. Further, the issue is NOT the family law issue, that is just government propaganda that some people are foolish enough to believe. The Court put it quite succinctly: “The court specifies … that compliance with those values cannot be reduced to an obligation which a candidate state must meet in order to accede to the European Union and which it may disregard after accession.” In other words, Hungary signed a legally binding treaty upon accession and must adhere to it. Further, Hungary has provoked concerns about the spending of EU funds by friends and family of the prime minister, Viktor Orbán. The EU is entitled to make sure that taxpayers of countries who do make a net contribution to the EU budget have their money well spent and not lining the pockets of politicians and oligarchs.
I agree for 100% with Anoniem and Juhasz Peter.
My friend, you don’t know what your saying. I think your brains needs more schooling. Eu stop serving it purpose since it started all these LGBT madness
@Juhasz Peter
Thank you @Juhasz Peter. Your comment is spot on, makes a refreshing read. It’s all government propaganda they want to fool the public with, especially with their control over most of the media.
As for my response, it is of course @Juhasz Peter. At least this comment is realistic.
Thank you @Juhasz Peter for your wise words. Hungary wants cash from the EU but refuses to accept civilised standards of tolerance and decency. The EU would be better off financially and ethically without Orban and his mates
How much is honor, self government and sovereignty worth? Is EU money worth sacrificing children? Hungarian elites happily sold out to the Hapsburgs and the result was Hungary’s lost lands at the end of WWI.
It is up to the Hungarian citizens and only the Hungarian citizens to chose their government without foreign influence either by Soros and his NGOs or Marxist Brussels.