HR
NL
FR
JA
RO
RU
ES
TR
How happy are the people of Hungary: Political climate edition
Hungary’s increasingly bitter political climate is no longer confined to parliamentary debates or election rallies. According to the latest national happiness survey conducted by Pénzcentrum, the tone of public discourse has begun to seep into everyday life, shaping moods, fuelling frustration and, for some, potentially undermining long-term wellbeing.
Are the people of Hungary content with the political landscape?
The survey, carried out at the end of last year as part of Pénzcentrum’s regular assessment of life satisfaction in Hungary, set out to explore what happiness really means for people today. While no definitive formula emerged, the findings paint a clear picture: public affairs, political communication and economic performance have become powerful emotional stressors for a growing share of the population.
This year’s research marks the third instalment of the survey series. Earlier sections examined personal satisfaction, perceived health, financial security, social relationships, work-related fulfilment and opportunities for self-realisation. The latest chapter widens the lens, focusing on how broader national and global developments influence daily contentment.
Politics as a source of frustration
One of the most telling questions asked respondents how frustrating they find Hungary’s political life and public discourse. On a scale from one to ten, the average score reached 7.2, signalling a slight but steady increase compared to previous years. In 2023, the average stood at 7.1, while two years earlier it was 6.8. The trend suggests a gradual erosion of tolerance towards the prevailing tone of political communication.
The sense of frustration is far from evenly distributed. Older respondents, particularly those over the age of 65, reported significantly higher stress levels linked to politics than younger participants. Those under 25 expressed notably lower levels of irritation, hinting at generational differences in political engagement or emotional exposure.
This frustration is present in every social level
Education also plays a decisive role. The higher the level of formal education, the stronger the frustration appears to be. Among university graduates and those holding doctoral degrees, average scores climbed to 7.5 and 7.6 respectively. By contrast, respondents with only primary education rated their frustration at around six points. This pattern suggests that people who follow public affairs more closely may be more sensitive to the aggressive or polarising nature of political debate.
Occupational background further sharpens the picture. Public workers, entrepreneurs and those receiving childcare benefits all reported similarly high frustration levels, averaging around 7.3. Meanwhile, public works employees recorded the lowest score at six points. Researchers note that individuals who interact more directly with state institutions or feel a stronger sense of social responsibility may be particularly affected by shifts in political tone.
We are not as sophisticated as we used to be
With Hungary heading into the 2026 election year, campaigning is already intensifying, and so is the rhetoric. Respondents were asked whether they felt the style of political discourse had improved, worsened or remained unchanged over the past year. The verdict was strikingly clear.
An overwhelming 85.74 per cent of respondents believe the tone has deteriorated. Just over 12 per cent saw no change, while a mere 2.19 per cent felt it had improved. Across all age groups, the perception of decline dominated. Younger respondents were slightly more likely to say the situation remained the same, while near-unanimity emerged among those over 65 that public discourse has become harsher. The idea that it has improved was virtually absent in every demographic.
The findings reflect widespread fatigue with confrontational language, personal attacks and divisive messaging, particularly on social media and in public debates. For many, this constant exposure to hostility has become impossible to ignore.
Economic pressure and emotional strain
Beyond politics, economic performance is another major factor shaping public mood. Participants were asked how much recent economic developments affected their general emotional state, again using a ten-point scale. The results suggest deep unease. High scores were common, with the maximum value of ten appearing with notable frequency, pointing to intense anxiety among many respondents.
Older age groups once again felt the greatest pressure. Among those over 65, the average frustration level reached 6.4, compared to just 5.2 among respondents under 25. Life stage, future prospects and financial vulnerability all appear to influence how economic uncertainty is experienced.
Employment status further highlights inequality in emotional impact. While public works employees reported relatively low levels of stress, the highest frustration was recorded among unemployed individuals and those receiving childcare benefits. These groups, often facing insecurity or transition, seem particularly exposed to economic shocks.
It often is in life that it is hard to know how happy you are until aspects of that happiness either diminish entirely.
Case in point, my country – the disUnited States of America.
Looking back at the 1950s, 60s, and 70s, even the 1980s – we, as a nation, were incredibly happy – actually giddy and bubbly compared to where we are now.
How does this pertain to the coming election in Hungary?
My view, as a White Southerner, living in the United States, is that, though Hungarians are not a financially rich nation, and, yes, apparently suffer from a frustrating amount of corruption at institutional levels, that, as a whole, y’all Hungarians are a healthy and happy people – much more so than are we.
In fact, now that I understand Hungarian reasonably well, and listen to every sort of Hungarian on my computer, I have come to think that y’all are a bit spoiled.
You have it good, or, if not that, then better than we, and, I do believe, in Germany, France, England, and the Low Countries currently do.
You think your current prime minister is a sham and a flop?
Trying living under a Merz, Biden, Macron, Van der Leyen, or a Starmer.
You’ll find out soon enough what a real sham is.
My hopes for y’all is that y’all make a good choice this coming election, so that you do not find out how good you had it in the early 2020s.
What could be the difference between this and the last election?
Maybe a major political figure promising gulags if he wins might contribute to the people thinking the “tone” of political discourse is deteriorating?
And, just possibly, the rage-monger rhetoric that is designed to bait the young and inexperienced voter into a fatal mistake to the nation is less frustrating to the young people, because they are mislead?
It is Magyar, who is spreading hatred, making threats, promises violence. And don’t get me wrong, I am not a tree-fagot hippy. I would like the death penalty reintroduced, for example, so I understand that sometimes you need to use force. But I don’t want political figures under threat of violence.