Focus on North Africa: why should the US recognise the Polisario Front as a terrorist organisation?

Change language:
The conflict over Western Sahara has again drawn international attention, emerging as a regional dispute and a critical arena in the global power struggle. What was once viewed as a stalemate between Morocco and the separatist Polisario Front now poses a direct threat to U.S. security and geopolitical interests. While the Polisario portrays itself as a liberation movement, it effectively operates as a paramilitary group involved in radicalization, arms trafficking, and aligning with the strategic objectives of nations like Iran and Russia.
Morocco’s Role and U.S. Interests
Morocco is one of America’s closest regional partners and a non-NATO ally. The relationship is reciprocal, with Morocco seeing the United States as a stable and reliable ally, playing a vital role in maintaining regional peace. In 2020, President Donald Trump broke with longstanding U.S. neutrality and officially recognized Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara. This marked a pivotal shift in aligning American foreign policy with regional realities. Yet this move alone is insufficient: the next logical step for the United States would be to designate the Polisario Front as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO).
The group not only violates UN-brokered ceasefires but also diverts humanitarian aid, smuggles arms, maintains ties with Hezbollah and the PKK, and has acquired drones with Iranian support. These activities go far beyond separatism—the Polisario has become a tool of destabilization in the Sahel, where American troops are deployed, and jihadist groups pose a growing threat to Washington.
For the West, Morocco remains the last pillar of stability in the region, according to Hudson.org. Russian Wagner mercenaries and Iranian-supplied weaponry have only deepened the instability, while the Polisario’s operations have long been overlooked. Continued U.S. inaction may not only suggest a lack of commitment to its allies but also indicate strategic weakness.
However, political will is beginning to take shape in Washington. Rep. Joe Wilson is preparing legislation spotlighting the threat posed by the Polisario, while Senator Marco Rubio firmly supports Morocco’s autonomy plan as the only credible resolution. An FTO designation would be legally justified and clearly communicate U.S. strategic resolve.
Historical and Ideological Background
Historically, the Polisario emerged during the Cold War as a proxy of the Eastern Bloc, backed by the Soviet Union, Libya, and Cuba. From the outset, its strategy relied on guerrilla warfare, propaganda, and disinformation—a playbook it continues to follow today. The UN-brokered ceasefire in 1991 brought only temporary calm; a lasting solution has remained elusive and has created an opening now exploited by nations seeking to diminish U.S. influence in Africa.
3 Comments
Comments are closed.






Do not forget the last declaration of the Avisor of US Président Trump, saying that any solution has to be accepted by the Sahrasi. So, the USA recognises that Polisario is legitimate, and it is recognised by the UN in its different resolutions.
A „Poliszário Front” (a spanyol Frente Popular para la Liberación de Saguia El Hamra y Río de Oro rövidítése) az ENSZ által „a Nyugat-Szahara népének törvényes képviselőjének” ismert (lásd az 1979. november 21-i 34/37. számú határozat 7. paragrafusát, valamint az 1980. november 11-i 35/19. számú határozatot). Ugyanezek a határozatok elismerik „a Nyugat-Szahara népének küzdelmének törvényességét” jogaiért, beleértve az önrendelkezési és függetlenségi jogot.
Ez a „Poliszário Front” az egyik konfliktusfél, amely aláírta az 1991-es fegyverszüneti megállapodást, és képviselteti magát az ENSZ-en belül.
Emellett az Európai Bíróság 2024. október 4-i végleges ítélete a Nyugat-Szahara javára szólt. Az ítélet megerősítette, hogy a „Poliszário Front” „törvényes” és „megfelel a feltételeknek ahhoz, hogy az Európai Unió bírósága előtt kérelmezze a vitatott döntések megváltoztatását a szaharaui nép érdekében”.
it is strange to see that every occupier is qualifiying the liberation movement as terrorist while it is an liberation movement againt occupation. Israel and Morroco are both occupier and both of them accuse palestinians and sahrasis to be terrorist in order to legitimate the occupation….the history is full of similar cases…..
shame on you journalist loooking for money…how much you receive from Morroco ????