PM security advisor: Hungary rejects implementing EU migration pact
Hungary doesn’t want to implement the measures of the European Union’s migration pact which was not adopted with a unanimous vote, and rejects settling migrants in the country, the prime minister’s chief security advisor told commercial TV2 on Thursday.
György Bakondi said the EU approach to allow migrants into the bloc’s territory to await the assessment of their asylum applications “after they have crossed 6 to 8 safe countries” was “mistaken”.
“In 2015, botched EU asylum policies led to some 400,000 migrants jostling here”, he warned.
“Hungary had done everything in its power to change EU decision-makers’ stance, but its efforts had been in vain,” Bakondi said.
Under the pact, EU countries may pay a quota if they refuse to accept illegal migrants, he said. At the same time, all member states are mandated to accept immigrants in emergency situations, “and determining when it is an emergency will be decided centrally”.
“Settling migrants” is against Hungary’s fundamental law, and it is in Hungary’s national interest to only accept those who have already obtained a refugee status, he added.
He said that through the National Consultation public survey, Hungarians could give a mandate to the government to continue to vigorously represent its stance in the EU.
Read also:
Source: MTI
please make a donation here
Hot news
Hungarian minister asked banks to keep home loan APRs under 5%
Top Hungary news: flood photo report, Putin’s minister in Budapest, Iron Maiden – 20 September, 2024
Renowned Hungarian-born photographer’s exhibition opens in Rome
Chinese ambassador in Budapest: China ready to cooperate further with Hungary
‘Hungarian Rome’ chosen among the most astonishing underrated cities in the world
Council of Europe exhorts Hungary to legislation reforms concerning migration, life sentences
1 Comment
Absolutely. There should be nothing to discuss or assess. They DID all pass through multiple perfectly safe countries, which means they are not in genuine fear for their lives but economic migrants. They should, as such, be turned back summarily. It is astounding that this is in any way contentious, let alone that it is not the default policy of the EUrogarbage.